Vivek Ramaswamy

understandable skepticism of, okay, what else is actually going on? If not, if not that, what exactly is going on here?

understandable skepticism of, okay, what else is actually going on? If not, if not that, what exactly is going on here?

We can't know, obviously. I looked at some post-election polling about the views that that would have had, and I can't prove that to you, but that's my instinct. It's my opinion.

We can't know, obviously. I looked at some post-election polling about the views that that would have had, and I can't prove that to you, but that's my instinct. It's my opinion.

We can't know, obviously. I looked at some post-election polling about the views that that would have had, and I can't prove that to you, but that's my instinct. It's my opinion.

Let me ask you one question, because bias is one thing, bias in reporting. Censorship is another. So I would be open-minded to hearing an instance of – and if I did hear it, I would condemn it – of the government systematically ordering – tech companies to suppress information that was favorable to Democrats, suppress that information to lift up Republicans.

Let me ask you one question, because bias is one thing, bias in reporting. Censorship is another. So I would be open-minded to hearing an instance of – and if I did hear it, I would condemn it – of the government systematically ordering – tech companies to suppress information that was favorable to Democrats, suppress that information to lift up Republicans.

Let me ask you one question, because bias is one thing, bias in reporting. Censorship is another. So I would be open-minded to hearing an instance of – and if I did hear it, I would condemn it – of the government systematically ordering – tech companies to suppress information that was favorable to Democrats, suppress that information to lift up Republicans.

If there was an instance that we know of government bureaucrats that were ordering technology companies covertly to silence information that voters otherwise would have had to advantage Republicans at the ballot box, to censor it, I would be against that.

If there was an instance that we know of government bureaucrats that were ordering technology companies covertly to silence information that voters otherwise would have had to advantage Republicans at the ballot box, to censor it, I would be against that.

If there was an instance that we know of government bureaucrats that were ordering technology companies covertly to silence information that voters otherwise would have had to advantage Republicans at the ballot box, to censor it, I would be against that.

And I will condemn that with equal force as I do to the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story, suppression and censorship of the origin of COVID-19. All happened in 2020. These are hard facts. I'm not aware of one instance. If you are aware of one, let me know, because I would condemn it.

And I will condemn that with equal force as I do to the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story, suppression and censorship of the origin of COVID-19. All happened in 2020. These are hard facts. I'm not aware of one instance. If you are aware of one, let me know, because I would condemn it.

And I will condemn that with equal force as I do to the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story, suppression and censorship of the origin of COVID-19. All happened in 2020. These are hard facts. I'm not aware of one instance. If you are aware of one, let me know, because I would condemn it.

But there's two different problems. I just want to sort them out, right? Because I have a problem with both. You talked about two issues. I think both are important, but they're different issues. One is bias in reporting. One is censorship of information, right? So bias in reporting, I felt certainly the recent presidential debate moderated by ABC was biased in the way that it was conducted.

But there's two different problems. I just want to sort them out, right? Because I have a problem with both. You talked about two issues. I think both are important, but they're different issues. One is bias in reporting. One is censorship of information, right? So bias in reporting, I felt certainly the recent presidential debate moderated by ABC was biased in the way that it was conducted.

But there's two different problems. I just want to sort them out, right? Because I have a problem with both. You talked about two issues. I think both are important, but they're different issues. One is bias in reporting. One is censorship of information, right? So bias in reporting, I felt certainly the recent presidential debate moderated by ABC was biased in the way that it was conducted.

But that's a different issue from saying that voters don't get access to information through any source. So this Hunter Biden laptop story, we now know that it contains evidence of foreign interference against in potentially the Biden administration and their families incentive structure, that story was systematically suppressed.

But that's a different issue from saying that voters don't get access to information through any source. So this Hunter Biden laptop story, we now know that it contains evidence of foreign interference against in potentially the Biden administration and their families incentive structure, that story was systematically suppressed.

But that's a different issue from saying that voters don't get access to information through any source. So this Hunter Biden laptop story, we now know that it contains evidence of foreign interference against in potentially the Biden administration and their families incentive structure, that story was systematically suppressed.