Vivek Ramaswamy

But I will say that even some of the regulations you brought up, right? The fireman example. Yeah. Most of those regs aren't just federal regulations. In fact, most of them that affect people at everyday lives are also at the level of the state.

And I think short of being a president, when you think about driving executive action to improve people's lives, I think a governor's seat is... probably the single best way to actually do it.

And I think short of being a president, when you think about driving executive action to improve people's lives, I think a governor's seat is... probably the single best way to actually do it.

And I think short of being a president, when you think about driving executive action to improve people's lives, I think a governor's seat is... probably the single best way to actually do it.

So I think it's a super fair question of fields of doubt over the couple of months. The question is, it's one thing if you are undoing the actions of people who have actually affirmatively made rules versus making new rules of your own.

So I think it's a super fair question of fields of doubt over the couple of months. The question is, it's one thing if you are undoing the actions of people who have actually affirmatively made rules versus making new rules of your own.

So I think it's a super fair question of fields of doubt over the couple of months. The question is, it's one thing if you are undoing the actions of people who have actually affirmatively made rules versus making new rules of your own.

I think if you're rolling back, if you're rolling back rules and actually cutting bureaucratic overgrowth, it's one thing to come in and say you're going to hire a million federal bureaucrats without any authorization from Congress to do it. It's another to say there are 4 million, many of whom were hired without that authorization. We need to scale that headcount back.

I think if you're rolling back, if you're rolling back rules and actually cutting bureaucratic overgrowth, it's one thing to come in and say you're going to hire a million federal bureaucrats without any authorization from Congress to do it. It's another to say there are 4 million, many of whom were hired without that authorization. We need to scale that headcount back.

I think if you're rolling back, if you're rolling back rules and actually cutting bureaucratic overgrowth, it's one thing to come in and say you're going to hire a million federal bureaucrats without any authorization from Congress to do it. It's another to say there are 4 million, many of whom were hired without that authorization. We need to scale that headcount back.

It's another thing to say all these regulations showed up with Congress never authorizing them. It's another to say they're illicit unless they go through Congress, right? So that was the premise. It's a one-way ratchet. If there's been a federal government overgrowth and a lot of that was never authorized by the democratic process,

It's another thing to say all these regulations showed up with Congress never authorizing them. It's another to say they're illicit unless they go through Congress, right? So that was the premise. It's a one-way ratchet. If there's been a federal government overgrowth and a lot of that was never authorized by the democratic process,

It's another thing to say all these regulations showed up with Congress never authorizing them. It's another to say they're illicit unless they go through Congress, right? So that was the premise. It's a one-way ratchet. If there's been a federal government overgrowth and a lot of that was never authorized by the democratic process,

then it's one thing to say, okay, then all of that, in order to comply with the Constitution, has to be rolled back. You can't make it without authorization.

then it's one thing to say, okay, then all of that, in order to comply with the Constitution, has to be rolled back. You can't make it without authorization.

then it's one thing to say, okay, then all of that, in order to comply with the Constitution, has to be rolled back. You can't make it without authorization.

I shared with you my outlook was in what brought me to the project. And I'm super rooting for success and hopeful for success for what's going to come from a technology-driven approach.

I shared with you my outlook was in what brought me to the project. And I'm super rooting for success and hopeful for success for what's going to come from a technology-driven approach.

I shared with you my outlook was in what brought me to the project. And I'm super rooting for success and hopeful for success for what's going to come from a technology-driven approach.

The truth of the matter is, I think there's nobody better in the world to run a technology-focused approach to fixing the federal government than Elon. And if that's where the focus is, I'm rooting for their success. And similarly, when I'm thinking about my legal, constitutional, legislative focus in downsizing government...