Winston Marshall

They've completely twisted our story so that instead of it being that we are the people that stood up against the Nazis, we are the people that defeated Hitler, we are the people, the British I'm talking about, that ended slavery. At great cost, the cost of billions and of thousands of British men. We are the people that defeated Napoleon.

They've completely twisted our story so that instead of it being that we are the people that stood up against the Nazis, we are the people that defeated Hitler, we are the people, the British I'm talking about, that ended slavery. At great cost, the cost of billions and of thousands of British men. We are the people that defeated Napoleon.

They've completely twisted our story so that instead of it being that we are the people that stood up against the Nazis, we are the people that defeated Hitler, we are the people, the British I'm talking about, that ended slavery. At great cost, the cost of billions and of thousands of British men. We are the people that defeated Napoleon.

Instead, young children are coming out of school thinking British Englishness, it's evil. And so the whole country, I believe, is falling apart because of that. We're really in the period of chaos. And that's why also you have, you know, Sadiq Khan banging on, as I said, diversity is our greatest strength. That's intentionally because that's their proposition.

Instead, young children are coming out of school thinking British Englishness, it's evil. And so the whole country, I believe, is falling apart because of that. We're really in the period of chaos. And that's why also you have, you know, Sadiq Khan banging on, as I said, diversity is our greatest strength. That's intentionally because that's their proposition.

Instead, young children are coming out of school thinking British Englishness, it's evil. And so the whole country, I believe, is falling apart because of that. We're really in the period of chaos. And that's why also you have, you know, Sadiq Khan banging on, as I said, diversity is our greatest strength. That's intentionally because that's their proposition.

That's the best they've got, but it can't last. And so, again, back to the arc, it was a feeling like, okay, maybe it's okay. Maybe it's okay to actually feel these things. But the question that hasn't been answered is, What is the correct relationship for the British with their story that includes all of these people that have come here, who have their own stories?

That's the best they've got, but it can't last. And so, again, back to the arc, it was a feeling like, okay, maybe it's okay. Maybe it's okay to actually feel these things. But the question that hasn't been answered is, What is the correct relationship for the British with their story that includes all of these people that have come here, who have their own stories?

That's the best they've got, but it can't last. And so, again, back to the arc, it was a feeling like, okay, maybe it's okay. Maybe it's okay to actually feel these things. But the question that hasn't been answered is, What is the correct relationship for the British with their story that includes all of these people that have come here, who have their own stories?

And without answering that question, we won't find unity as a nation.

And without answering that question, we won't find unity as a nation.

And without answering that question, we won't find unity as a nation.

And so there's a, if you don't mind, a slight side. But the irony is that Karl Popper actually spoke more about totalitarian Marx, Marxism, in his open societies, his famous open societies. Then he did about Nazism, of course he was criticizing Nazism, as a refugee in New Zealand, a Jewish refugee from Austria.

And so there's a, if you don't mind, a slight side. But the irony is that Karl Popper actually spoke more about totalitarian Marx, Marxism, in his open societies, his famous open societies. Then he did about Nazism, of course he was criticizing Nazism, as a refugee in New Zealand, a Jewish refugee from Austria.

And so there's a, if you don't mind, a slight side. But the irony is that Karl Popper actually spoke more about totalitarian Marx, Marxism, in his open societies, his famous open societies. Then he did about Nazism, of course he was criticizing Nazism, as a refugee in New Zealand, a Jewish refugee from Austria.

But the irony of that is that it's the famous tolerance paradox, which is actually buried in a footnote in that book. Where he writes, we should consider it criminal, those who, he doesn't use the word inspire intolerance, but that essentially inspire intolerance.

But the irony of that is that it's the famous tolerance paradox, which is actually buried in a footnote in that book. Where he writes, we should consider it criminal, those who, he doesn't use the word inspire intolerance, but that essentially inspire intolerance.

But the irony of that is that it's the famous tolerance paradox, which is actually buried in a footnote in that book. Where he writes, we should consider it criminal, those who, he doesn't use the word inspire intolerance, but that essentially inspire intolerance.

So even though he wrote against both Marxist and fascist totalitarianism, buried within there was the seed for a new type of totalitarianism that's, I think, emerged.

So even though he wrote against both Marxist and fascist totalitarianism, buried within there was the seed for a new type of totalitarianism that's, I think, emerged.