Xander Moricz

Which one?

You don't know anything about your study, whereas I know everything about the American Medical Association study, the American Psychological Association study, the American Psychiatric Association study, the American Pediatric Association study, the World Health Organization study, and countless global doctors who have referred and peer-reviewed those studies.

Your study, I would like you to talk about the methodology, how it was peer-reviewed, and how you're citing it.

Because what I do know about your study is not only are you manipulating it, but it's broken in its process.

Not all studies are run well because some studies can be broken, some studies aren't accurate, and some studies aren't well done.

And so I'm not saying I don't like your facts.

I'm saying...

The conversation we're having about the studies you're referencing don't attribute to the greater conversation we're having about LGBTQ plus people because of the ideologies and methodologies and practice of those studies.

What I am saying is the largest global medical organizations unanimously agree that queer and transgender affirming care, it is unanimous.

That's what makes it special.

It's not a medical consensus.

That's why it's so important.

I didn't say medical consensus.

I said the majority of health organizations that are the largest in the world and in the country all unanimously agree that queer, it is true.

You want to believe it because it does.

But when it's peer reviewed, when it's fact checked, and when people actually look into your studies, they realize that they're false.

You would be able to reference more.

You'd be able to reference peer reviewed sources.

You'd be able to reference medically established institutions.

The information there is new.