Zach Lahn

It's looking to bind.

It's actually one of the most powerful chelators, meaning, I won't go deep into that, but it's looking to bind to things.

What does it bind most closely to?

What does it grab onto?

Calcium.

So there's actually papers coming out now that are saying, they're theorizing that the reason this is happening, by the way, 1983, Monsanto did a study, a rat study,

that they did not ever publish publicly, but the EPA had, and the EPA referenced, so we know basically what's in it.

And in that study in 1983, they were testing where does glyphosate stay the longest?

What tissues?

And where it stayed the longest was bone.

And what the thought is now is that the reason is glyphosate is actually going into your bone marrow, it's attaching to calcium in your bones, and it's creating basically a repository of glyphosate on a slow release cycle.

And so when you're releasing it into the bone marrow on a slow release cycle like that, and you're disrupting the cell replication cycle, because this is how cancer starts, is that you damage the DNA, and we know glyphosate is genotoxic.

We know this.

that it's creating like a bank of glyphosate in there.

And that's why people who have stopped eating this stuff for a long time will have that continue to come out in their urine.

And so... what's happening with this is that we know that it causes non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

We have a ton of data and evidence that it's genotoxic and that the cancer that's gonna come out of this is non-Hodgkin's lymphoma primarily.

But when the EPA doesn't even require you to test... Now, for the people out there that are going to challenge me on this, they don't require you to do the long-form chronic toxicity tests on the glyphosate-based herbicides, the ones that are formulated, that are way more toxic.

They require that just on the product.

And this is how so much of this is obscured.