Zach Lahn

You can pull out study after study that will show that this product, Pure, doesn't have a high risk profile, which by the way, most of those are industry studies.

We know this.

Like the EPA or in the EU banned this version of glyphosate.

The industry submitted 1,500 studies, many of them they wouldn't even allow publicly to be released, but they're all industry studies.

And so the big difference between the EU's determination on the safety and the EPA's was three primary things.

Number one, the EU used glyphosate-based herbicides, the more toxic version that everybody's actually using.

Nobody's spraying pure glyphosate.

Number two, they looked at dose-dependent exposure.

So not just like what's the overall cancer rate,

And then there was one other category that they looked at that differentiated greatly.

It's slipping my mind right now.

But what the EU came to was that, yes, this is a probable carcinogen.

And they have far lower levels that are allowed in their bread, far lower levels allowed in their food.

So the agencies have been captured.

And now we are facing a situation where in Iowa, there's between six and nine agriculture chemicals within the wells in our state.

where it's everywhere.

Yeah, it is.

I had somebody once tell me recently, he's like, hey, you need to be more positive.

I mean out of the wells.

Can you get it out of there?