Zoltan Bathory

and all that happens in the verbal realm yes because regardless of the religion they use a set of like a language be it sanskrit being hebrew being english being whatever it is right you are operating in that box and everything that you can talk about is a a loose description of something

and all that happens in the verbal realm yes because regardless of the religion they use a set of like a language be it sanskrit being hebrew being english being whatever it is right you are operating in that box and everything that you can talk about is a a loose description of something

and all that happens in the verbal realm yes because regardless of the religion they use a set of like a language be it sanskrit being hebrew being english being whatever it is right you are operating in that box and everything that you can talk about is a a loose description of something

So you have to move outside of the box, outside of the language, and move beyond that point where it becomes an experience. When it's an experience, I'm pretty sure the experience is exactly the same to every, in quote, religion. The split comes from the different culture and language that you're explaining or talk about the things about.

So you have to move outside of the box, outside of the language, and move beyond that point where it becomes an experience. When it's an experience, I'm pretty sure the experience is exactly the same to every, in quote, religion. The split comes from the different culture and language that you're explaining or talk about the things about.

So you have to move outside of the box, outside of the language, and move beyond that point where it becomes an experience. When it's an experience, I'm pretty sure the experience is exactly the same to every, in quote, religion. The split comes from the different culture and language that you're explaining or talk about the things about.

If you go to the experiment part, which is outside of language, which is below, before the filters, right? That takes out information. Then it's probably exactly the same. It's your description of your experience is what difference, right? And then, but then he was talking about the functionality of, of yes, it is our purpose maybe to go and experiment and figure out things and, and, and,

If you go to the experiment part, which is outside of language, which is below, before the filters, right? That takes out information. Then it's probably exactly the same. It's your description of your experience is what difference, right? And then, but then he was talking about the functionality of, of yes, it is our purpose maybe to go and experiment and figure out things and, and, and,

If you go to the experiment part, which is outside of language, which is below, before the filters, right? That takes out information. Then it's probably exactly the same. It's your description of your experience is what difference, right? And then, but then he was talking about the functionality of, of yes, it is our purpose maybe to go and experiment and figure out things and, and, and,

and have answers to this ultimate question what are we doing here why are we doing it now you equate it to the submarine that you might open a window that you shouldn't be opening right this could be true that we could be barreling down in paths that you know that are not exactly optimal or even detrimental right but if we just stay with the pragmatic the absolute pragmatic basics then

and have answers to this ultimate question what are we doing here why are we doing it now you equate it to the submarine that you might open a window that you shouldn't be opening right this could be true that we could be barreling down in paths that you know that are not exactly optimal or even detrimental right but if we just stay with the pragmatic the absolute pragmatic basics then

and have answers to this ultimate question what are we doing here why are we doing it now you equate it to the submarine that you might open a window that you shouldn't be opening right this could be true that we could be barreling down in paths that you know that are not exactly optimal or even detrimental right but if we just stay with the pragmatic the absolute pragmatic basics then

The experience of it, right? When it's nonverbal, it's most likely the same. So this is the language and the descriptions that separates it into different buckets of religion. And the question is always going to be the same. Why? Why? What is the purpose? So that is a fundamental question of all.

The experience of it, right? When it's nonverbal, it's most likely the same. So this is the language and the descriptions that separates it into different buckets of religion. And the question is always going to be the same. Why? Why? What is the purpose? So that is a fundamental question of all.

The experience of it, right? When it's nonverbal, it's most likely the same. So this is the language and the descriptions that separates it into different buckets of religion. And the question is always going to be the same. Why? Why? What is the purpose? So that is a fundamental question of all.

I don't think it's human. The question is general, right? I think in any other species, any other species exist in this universe will have the same questions, the same exact questions. It doesn't matter that you grew up in a different solar system in different circumstances. The question will be the same.

I don't think it's human. The question is general, right? I think in any other species, any other species exist in this universe will have the same questions, the same exact questions. It doesn't matter that you grew up in a different solar system in different circumstances. The question will be the same.

I don't think it's human. The question is general, right? I think in any other species, any other species exist in this universe will have the same questions, the same exact questions. It doesn't matter that you grew up in a different solar system in different circumstances. The question will be the same.

I can drop a paradox on top on this. I can drop a massive paradox. Okay. So because it makes sense, right? That we should know. But knowing that we shouldn't know is also knowing. I'm going to give you an actual experience that I personally had in the space, deep in the space. I've been there hundreds and hundreds of times, and there are different levels, and I'll give you an actual example.

I can drop a paradox on top on this. I can drop a massive paradox. Okay. So because it makes sense, right? That we should know. But knowing that we shouldn't know is also knowing. I'm going to give you an actual experience that I personally had in the space, deep in the space. I've been there hundreds and hundreds of times, and there are different levels, and I'll give you an actual example.