Can Labor be forced to end negative gearing?

episode

7am not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Is liberal democracy running out of answers? 18 min · 25 Sep 2026

Could Australia’s media survive Trump-style attacks? 17 min · 24 Sep 2026

The absurd lengths Australia goes to keep Nauru Airlines flying 16 min · 23 Sep 2026

Trump and Murdoch: The enemies who need each other 16 min · 22 Sep 2026

A richer Australia in 2066 – but for who? 14 min · 21 Sep 2026

All episodes from 7am →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded15 Feb 2024

Publisheromnycontent.com ↗

Handlerec:7079495

Show notes

Following its loss at the 2019 federal election, touching negative gearing — tax concessions that benefit property investors — has been unthinkable for the Labor Party.But this week the government was drawn into discussions about ending it by The Greens’ housing spokesperson, Max Chandler-Mather, demanding Anthony Albanese address it if he wants to pass a new housing policy.So, could the Greens force Labor to tackle negative gearing? Today, columnist for The Saturday Paper Paul Bongiorno on the future of housing and why unproductive parliamentary Question Time debates might have to change.Socials: Stay in touch with us on Twitter and InstagramGuest: Columnist for The Saturday Paper, Paul Bongiorno.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

More from 7am