What did the ICJ's ruling really mean?

episode

7am not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Is liberal democracy running out of answers? 18 min · 25 Sep 2026

Could Australia’s media survive Trump-style attacks? 17 min · 24 Sep 2026

The absurd lengths Australia goes to keep Nauru Airlines flying 16 min · 23 Sep 2026

Trump and Murdoch: The enemies who need each other 16 min · 22 Sep 2026

A richer Australia in 2066 – but for who? 14 min · 21 Sep 2026

All episodes from 7am →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded30 Jan 2024

Publisheromnycontent.com ↗

Handlerec:7079508

Show notes

Last weekend’s decision by the International Court of Justice was heralded as a victory by many.South Africa and the Palestinian Authority saw it as a vindication, as orders have been made to prevent any genocidal acts in Gaza and the ICJ will move towards a full trial.Others heralded it as a win for Israel, with the court refusing to make an order for the end of military action against Hamas.Today, expert in international law and Professor of Law at the University of California Davis Chimene Keitner, on what the ICJ really considered and what their interim decision means.Socials: Stay in touch with us on Twitter and InstagramGuest: Expert in international law and Professor of Law at the University of California Davis Chimene KeitnerSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

More from 7am