Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Libraries Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing
Podcast Image

The a16z Show

Marc Andreessen on AI, Technology, and the Future of Humanity

25 Jun 2026

Transcription

Transcript generated automatically by AI and may contain errors.

Chapter 1: What are Marc Andreessen's views on the impact of AI on productivity?

1.043 - 14.88 Marc Andreessen

AI is like the best possible teacher, coach, mentor that you've ever had. It will like walk you through everything. It'll teach you how to do marketing. It'll teach you how to do sales. The level of capability that is being unlocked for ordinary people to have a level of productivity in their life and in their work that they've never had access to before is amazing.

0

15.541 - 26.494 Marc Andreessen

The models two years from now are going to be far smarter and more sophisticated than anything that we have access to today. Whatever limitations people think these things have, whatever people think it is that the thing can't do within two years, I think the thing will be able to do it.

0

26.474 - 36.584 Marc Andreessen

Our ancestors, 300 years from now, even 30 years from now, are going to look back at us being like, I cannot believe they did that. I cannot believe they spent time doing those things. Like, that was such a waste of human potential. That was such a waste of human creativity.

0

37.305 - 58.313 Jack Altman

Few people have had a front row seat to as many technology revolutions as Marc Andreessen. From helping build Mosaic and Netscape in the early days of the internet, to investing in many of today's most important technology companies, Andreessen has spent decades thinking about how new technologies reshape society. Today, the focus is artificial intelligence.

0

58.333 - 84.072 Jack Altman

In this conversation with Michael Malice, Andreessen explains how modern AI systems actually work, why he believes many fears about AI are overstated, and how technological progress has historically created new opportunities, even as it disrupted old ways of working. The discussion spans AI, automation, productivity, cybersecurity, economic growth, and the future of human potential.

86.144 - 105.013 Michael Malice

Good afternoon. Michael Malice here. Let that be your welcome for the next hour. Guys, we have a very special returning guest, Marc Andreessen, Internet OG. You worked on Mosaic. You worked on Netscape. You were here since the very beginning. We just spent 15 minutes trying to get this connection working, and the answer was rebooting your computer, which takes me back to my tech support days.

106.664 - 119.879 Marc Andreessen

No, we have this running joke. We have this running joke. We have all these AI super geniuses come in the office and they've all got, you know, they've got everything all figured out and they literally spend 20 minutes. They can't get to a laptop to connect to the projector. And now I'm one of them.

120.92 - 136.418 Michael Malice

So we're going to talk a lot about AI because I have a lot of opinions and not a lot of information, which is a dangerous place to be. And that's why I want to talk to you. Mark, you have a book out with Passage Press called The Techno Optimist Manifesto. I have my copy. You can get it. It's really cool because it's got this metal cover.

136.398 - 159.093 Michael Malice

And I, like you, share an enormous sense of optimism about technology, although I'm sure you agree with me that you love Thomas Sowell. And I think Thomas Sowell's greatest quote is, there's no solutions, there's only trade-offs. And people think that if something has a problem with it, therefore it's a no-go, as opposed to the reality, which is everything has a cost. Everything has a downside.

Chapter 2: How do modern AI systems differ from earlier AI concepts?

203.29 - 218.829 Marc Andreessen

Yeah, well, so look, I would start by saying, look, humanity's always been, you know, justifiably obsessed with ourselves, right? And so, and then as a consequence, we're obsessed with things that seem like they might be like us. You know, there's this, you know, concept in psychology called anthropomorphizing, right?

0

218.849 - 233.247 Marc Andreessen

Where you basically look at something that's not human, but you kind of want to read, you know, humanity into it. And, you know, I mean, look, we do that with like, you know, we do that with cats and dogs. Bambi. We do that with Bambi. You know, there's a famous Disney marketing tagline from the movie Pinocchio.

0

233.227 - 253.42 Marc Andreessen

1940, which is America will, America, you know, 1940, America will fall in love with the cardboard cricket. Yeah. You know, Jiminy Cricket, right? You know, Kermit the Frog. I mean, you just, you know, South Park kids, right? You just go like right on the list. You know, you'll basically read humanity in anything. Yeah. And so there's this very natural kind of thing to do that.

0

253.44 - 271.384 Marc Andreessen

And then of course, the scientists involved in AI very deliberately set that up. They literally created this architecture called a neural network, which was modeled after the human brain. And then they said, if we work on this long enough, we'll eventually be able to replicate the human brain and we'll have literally artificial intelligence, like we'll have kind of artificial people.

0

Chapter 3: What are the common misconceptions about AI and its capabilities?

271.364 - 288.681 Marc Andreessen

So, you know, that, you know, and, you know, kind of as you kind of track the arc of that idea, it kind of goes through Frankenstein's monster, right? It kind of then goes into robots. And then, you know, of course, we've had fictional portrayals of AI, you know, you know, coming out of Hollywood and, you know, coming out of the science fiction world for, you know, over 100 years.

0

288.661 - 298.772 Marc Andreessen

Um, and then, you know, in the last, you know, whatever, 40 years or whatever, you know, the image that kind of stuck in everybody's head, I think more than anything else was, you know, was Skynet and, and, you know, Arnold Schwarzenegger, you know, Terminator 2.

0

299.813 - 313.629 Marc Andreessen

Um, and, you know, when I, when I watched, you know, Terminator movies obviously are brilliant, you know, when I watched them, to me, it's like very clear what's happening in them, which is it's, it's basically, you know, it's basically robot, it's just robot Nazis, right? Like fundamentally, right? It's, it's like, it's like, you know, It's like robot World War II.

0

313.69 - 332.154 Marc Andreessen

It's like, you know, unthinking, unfeeling, uncaring, hierarchical, you know, like overly logical, you know, relentless, unstoppable, you know, and then obviously homicidal, right? Like obviously they want to wipe out humanity and they just kind of set up this very, you know, light versus dark, you know, human versus machine. you know, kind of struggle.

0

332.174 - 348.092 Marc Andreessen

And of course, you know, look at, you know, you can imagine, you know, various worlds in which something like that, you know, does get built and, you know, say one of the things mankind is very good at is building killing machines, right? Like we've been quite talented at that for a very long time. So that's kind of set a lot of the popular perception.

348.752 - 365.179 Marc Andreessen

The interesting thing about what's happening, and I should also say, like, as you said, like I'm an optimist, not a utopian. And so like every technology is a double-edged sword. Every technology gets used for good and for bad. Again, there's a long history of that. Having said that, the AI that we actually got is not the AI that we thought we were going to get.

365.24 - 384.512 Marc Andreessen

We actually got something very different than we thought we were going to get. And specifically, the AI that we got is in the form of what we now call these large language models, which, by the way, Large language models were like a very fringe idea up until like literally like, like the company OpenAI, for example, which, you know, really catalyzed this whole thing, you know, kicked it off.

384.552 - 402.268 Marc Andreessen

And, you know, today, you know, the leading, the leading, you know, company with Chet GPT, like OpenAI was not founded, you know, 10 years ago to do large language models. It was founded to do a different kind of AI. And it turned out classic kind of story technology. There was literally one guy in the back room, this guy, Alec Redford, and he had this idea and he's like, oh, I don't know.

402.288 - 418.638 Marc Andreessen

I think maybe if we like take this language approach, it might be interesting. And he created GPT-1 and then GPT-2 and then GPT-3. And then, by the way, ChatGPT was actually kind of an accidental success. Like, they didn't believe it was going to be like a big hit. You know, it was like a little experiment, you know, kind of off to the side.

Chapter 4: How does technological progress create new opportunities for society?

482.821 - 490.672 Marc Andreessen

They compress basically all of human knowledge and culture into latent space And you think of latent space as like a thousand dimensional, basically compressed representation of all human culture.

0

491.333 - 508.157 Marc Andreessen

And then when you talk to ChatGPT, when you type in whatever your question is, it basically, the way I think about it is it sort of sends a probe through that latent space, through that like thousand dimensional latent space. And then it basically, you know, it constructs an answer, but it constructs an answer based on the compression of all basically known human information.

0

508.137 - 527.418 Marc Andreessen

And it comes back at you. So it's like talking to a mirror of humanity, right? It's like talking to a representation of everything that people have ever thought and said. By the way, for every question that you ask, there are many possible answers in the latent space, and it just happens to pick one. But there are many others.

0

527.478 - 541.926 Marc Andreessen

And actually, if you ask ChatGPT the same question twice, it will give you two different answers. right, because it's sort of firing these probes in a somewhat sort of semi-random way to try to get, you know, basically variation and creativity out of it. But you're basically talking, you're basically getting echoes back from collective humanity.

0

542.668 - 550.764 Marc Andreessen

And that's just like a much, much, much, much different thing that we thought we were going to get. For example, one of the things you can do is you can engage in moral debates with it, right?

550.885 - 569.515 Marc Andreessen

You can like, you can have like very sophisticated debates about like moral psychology, about moral philosophy, all the different approaches, virtue ethics, utilitarianism, you know, religion, politics, like it will happily sit and I think have like very sophisticated discussions about all this stuff. And, you know, let's just say that was never in the James Cameron movies.

570.727 - 576.739 Michael Malice

Yeah, there's a lot there. So do you want me to go with my hopes or with my fears about the future of AI?

576.759 - 594.914 Marc Andreessen

Let's start with hopes because, you know, part of hopefully what we'll talk about today is like that, say, humanity always basically there's this like... The negative view always seems like it's going to be the sophisticated view or the sophisticated view. I hate that. Exactly. And I know you don't like that. And so, and that's a very, it's a very naturally human thing.

594.934 - 606.893 Marc Andreessen

And then, and then I would, I would also say, Michael, I think we live in a particularly pessimistic time in which there's like a very large number of moral entrepreneurs who basically want to convince us that like everything is bad. Right. And, you know, we've been through, you know, a decade of like craziness in that front.

Chapter 5: What are the historical patterns of technological disruption?

657.105 - 674.446 Michael Malice

Now, I'm sure everyone listening to this agrees that the Me Too movement got out of hand. But regards to people like Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein, her point was from the time of Eve until five minutes ago, these powerful men could just be predators with no repercussions out in the open, Meryl Streep standing up and applauding, so on and so forth.

0

674.947 - 696.993 Michael Malice

And then when it happened, she was like, holy crap, like this has never happened before in history. There's a thing that's been the case since the days of pharaohs until 2025, which is this, which is there's this idea that if I have any political view, anyone at all can come up to me and demand that I explain myself to them to justify my perspective.

0

697.474 - 718.524 Michael Malice

And now they're in a power position because they have something ostensibly that I want. And then if I can't persuade them and they're perfectly happy to dig in their heels, well, then I lose and they won and ha, ha, ha. And it's this stupid game that people constantly play in Bad Faith Online. Now, however, I can say, hey, Grok, explain X to this person.

0

719.386 - 743.285 Michael Malice

Grok is now not just a better writer than the average person. Grok is a better writer than me, who is a professional author. Because he replied with this two-paragraph explanation of my thoughts with no... a seed of mine. I said, explain how I think about this. And I wouldn't change a word. And this is 2026. And so many times you have people in bad faith coming at you. I send Grok after them.

0

743.646 - 766.934 Michael Malice

And Grok says, no, you're being dishonest. So there was this idea until 2025 that the customer is always right. And now for the first time, the product is telling the customer, no, you are not right. And why I'm very hopeful about this is I think COVID taught a lot of people how to keep people stuck on their screens in a state of constant agitation.

767.214 - 784.359 Michael Malice

We're all looking at the updates, no matter what our perspective was on COVID. Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, so on and so forth. They want us looking at Facebook. They want us looking at Twitter. COVID may be gone, but those metrics and those tools are still there. And I think these algorithms have been keeping people very upset needlessly for quite some time.

784.539 - 798.542 Michael Malice

And I'm very hopeful that Grok and all these other outlets will be able to be used to keep people in a more rational, calm, and optimistic state. That's where I am. Am I wrong? Or I'd love to hear your thoughts.

798.691 - 814.669 Marc Andreessen

Yeah, so I mean, there's an old phrase you can apply to what you're describing, right? Which is truth to power. Yeah, that's right. Yep. And of course, everybody likes the idea of truth to power until they're the power. Yep, that's right. Amen. And somebody else has the truth, right?

815.189 - 823.506 Marc Andreessen

Yeah, and look, AIs, like I would say this, like AIs are somewhat autistic in the sense of like, they do tend to just tell you the truth. Yeah. You know, they do tend to just say the thing.

Chapter 6: How can AI enhance human creativity and potential?

905.765 - 921.608 Michael Malice

It just doesn't understand what you mean by ringtail, which is just going to take you two seconds just with the Latin name. But I think people feel this need it's part of what you were talking about with this pessimism, what I would call cynicism, that anyone who is intelligent must be a phony or disingenuous or this Achilles heel.

0

922.049 - 942.963 Michael Malice

And instead of, look, if it's, Mark, I don't know how many brainstorming sessions you've had in your life, but if you have a session and 99 ideas are completely stupid and one is the one that you want, that session was an enormous success. So the fact is, if this machine is getting it right 98% of the time, and 2% of getting it wrong, you can't compare it to Utopia.

0

943.243 - 950.46 Michael Malice

You have to compare it to as to what? At no cost and at no time, it's right 98% of the time, this is almost paradise.

0

951.041 - 964.169 Marc Andreessen

Yeah, that's right. And here's another thing, building on that, it's improving really quickly. Yes. And I think a lot of people have a lagging view even of what it can do today because what happens is they use the free models or they'll use the freer outdated models.

0

964.209 - 978.89 Marc Andreessen

And so, you know, they'll have tried ShedGPT two years ago or they use whatever is default built into whatever thing they have or they use the free version of something and they really don't have a sense of what it's capable of to really get it. And by the way, you know, Grok is very good for the free version, but like the really, really good ones are the paid ones.

978.95 - 996.31 Marc Andreessen

And it's really worth it if people are interested in this. I think it's for several of them, Anthropic, OpenAI, Grok, and I'm not sure about Google right now, but there's even high-end versions. There's a $200 a month subscription for people who can afford that and are kind of into this. The leading-edge ones are really good.

996.731 - 1009.885 Marc Andreessen

And then the thing that's happening is the improvement rate's very fast. And so there's this concept in the AI world called scaling laws. It's actually a very simple idea, but it's very powerful, which basically is you can make these things better just by making them bigger.

1009.865 - 1020.261 Marc Andreessen

And so what you're seeing, you know, you're seeing these AI companies raise all this money, they're raising all this money for two reasons. One is to serve all their customers. But the other reason is because they're training bigger and bigger models. And it turns out bigger, bigger is better.

1020.281 - 1031.838 Marc Andreessen

Like if you just pile more information in, and you spend more time training it, you get much better results. And then the other thing that we're doing in the technology is we're giving these AIs other capabilities.

Chapter 7: What are the ethical concerns surrounding AI's rapid advancement?

1270.469 - 1271.65 Michael Malice

That's the concern.

0

1271.63 - 1285.065 Marc Andreessen

Yeah, and of course, as you point out, this is an old idea, right? And yeah, just market research. I mean, you know, you just described the movie WALL-E, right? Which is, you know, pre-AI, you know, just sit in front of a screen. I mean, my entire childhood was consumed with a moral panic around television, right?

0

1285.085 - 1294.855 Marc Andreessen

Which is this idea that we're just going to be couch potatoes and sit there and do nothing. And then, of course, we created this new technology called the internet where you're leaning forward doing things all the time. And then everybody created a brand new moral panic that people are now too engaged and too interactive.

0
0

1295.356 - 1308.899 Marc Andreessen

I completely forgot the old moral panic. Now, you know, now TV is the healthy thing. Like, why aren't you watching more Netflix as opposed to being on the internet? And so, yeah, so, so look, you know, look, there is that. And look, by the way, as you know, like we do this to each other, right?

1308.939 - 1325.495 Marc Andreessen

Like, you know, like we try to convince each other of things, you know, we try to convince each other, you know, what, you know, what is dating, but trying to convince the other person to like you, right? Like, so, so yeah, there is that. And look, I think you're right. I think that, you know, that AIs are going to be, are going to be really, really good at this. Yeah.

1325.515 - 1336.617 Marc Andreessen

So I, you know, I think for sure that there, there's a trap there, you know, and there, by the way, there is this concept and it actually is, is a, is a, there actually is a, is a real, you know, I would say very serious problem around this. You've probably heard the term AI psychosis. Have you heard this?

1336.637 - 1336.757 Michael Malice

Yes.

1336.797 - 1337.919 Marc Andreessen

Oh, yes. Yeah.

Chapter 8: How does Marc Andreessen envision the future of work with AI?

1525.358 - 1533.685 Marc Andreessen

But the sort of moral criticism that applies is if you're excited, you know, it's the classic, again, negativity bias. If you're excited about something, you know, there must be something wrong with you. And so I think that's the third kind.

0

1533.665 - 1550.173 Michael Malice

There are these terms that get into the zeitgeist that people use discriminately. Right now, if there's a tweet anyone doesn't like, it's engagement farming. And it's like, if I'm telling you not to follow me, it's not engagement farming, it's the opposite. And I'll have Grok explain that to them. So that wraps up a nice little bow. You touched on something that I'm very concerned about.

0

1550.553 - 1573.763 Michael Malice

I was on a panel and Sam Altman had just announced that a chat GPT is going to be engaging in erotica. And everyone's laughing about it. And that what he meant was code, like you could sext with your chat GPT. And I went, guys, I remember 1981 when Hinckley thought that if he shot President Reagan, Jodie Foster would fall in love with him, thereby turning her away from men forever.

0

1573.743 - 1578.888 Michael Malice

Because he had this idea in his head. Now, if you have 350 million Americans, that's just Americans, right?

0

1579.409 - 1597.187 Michael Malice

And how many of them, if the algorithm tells them that if their chat GPT girlfriend, and these things are going to get more and more seductive over time, tells them that they hate the president or they hate this person, how many of them are actually going to do something to get that robot girlfriend to fall more in love with them? I don't think that number is zero.

1597.307 - 1598.869 Michael Malice

And that's a concern as well, no?

1599.049 - 1599.109

No.

1599.494 - 1617.941 Marc Andreessen

Yeah, I mean, yes, having said that, as I said, that assumes that the thing is playing hard to get. It goes back to the syncopacy thing. In practice, these things don't play hard to get. Oh, okay. Here's a way to think about it. There's actually a thing. This is actually kind of in how they're trained. There's something... Okay, you'll enjoy this.

1618.302 - 1635.682 Marc Andreessen

There's a technical term in how these things are trained. There's a concept called a reward function. Okay. And so you basically... One of the ways you train these things is you feed them basically lots of puzzles, lots of problems, lots of things, and then you basically define a reward for getting things right, for getting to a result, a desirable result, and then you kind of give them an award.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.