AJSM March 2026 Podcast: Recurrence Rate, Complications and Revisions in Long-term Follow-up of Arthroscopic Posterior Bankart Repair Compared to Posterior Bone Block

episode

American Journal of Sports Medicine not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

The Ezra Klein Show: Jensen Huang Thinks A.I. Alarmism Has Gone Too Far 1h 50m · 25 Sep 2026 · Hard Fork

What If We’ve Missed the Beauty of Sex? | The Gospels | Matthew 5:27–32 16 min · 25 Sep 2026 · Ten Minute Bible Talks Devotional Bible Study

Trump’s Standoff With White House Reporters, and the Rise and Fall of ‘Pervert Glasses’ 14 min · 25 Sep 2026 · The Headlines

Green Demon - Classic 34 min · 25 Sep 2026 · Spooked

Trump Unleashes Secret Biblical Strategy Against Xi Jinping 22 min · 25 Sep 2026 · Politics By Faith w/Mike Slater

Big meet, little meat: the Trump-Xi summit 27 min · 25 Sep 2026 · Economist Podcasts

Report any issue

Source

Recorded19 Mar 2026

Publishersageorthopaedics.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:17333065

Show notes

The literature suggests that both arthroscopic posterior Bankart repair (APB) and posterior bone block (PBB) are effective procedures in the short to medium term, although recurrence and revision rates do not appear to be negligible. However, fewer studies, especially comparative ones, are available regarding the long-term outcomes of these procedures. In conclusion, at a mean follow-up of 5 years for APB and 12 years for PBB, the APB group had a similar recurrence rate but fewer complications and revisions compared with the PBB group. Both techniques resulted in good to excellent clinical and functional outcomes, as well as high satisfaction and RTS rates. Click here to read the article.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in