In the third episode of this mini-series, we discuss how EU and UK regulators are seeking to strike a balance between competition law and sustainability agreements. As legislators and regulators increase their focus on sustainability agreements and competition law, this podcast episode assesses the UK and EU landscapes. To cover this evolving issue, Ashurst senior expertise lawyer Fiona Garside is joined by Irene Antypas from Ashurst’s Brussels office and Christopher Eberhardt from Ashurst’s London office. Together, they reflect on the challenge for authorities seeking to ensure that: Competition law doesn’t unduly stymy progress towards the UK and EU’s ambitious sustainability goals, and “Sustainability” isn’t used as a cover for anti-competitive agreements which do not genuinely promote sustainable progress. The discussion covers (and contrasts) guidance from the European Commission and the UK Competition and Markets Authority. The guidance distinguishes between sustainability agreements that are unlikely to infringe competition law and those that may raise concerns. It also considers the criteria for obtaining an individual exemption from the prohibition on anti-competitive agreements. To follow this continuing mini-series, subscribe to Ashurst Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related