Sometimes people do a study and find that a particular correlation is r = 0.2, or a particular effect size is d = 1.1. Then an article tries to "put this in context". "The study found r = 0.2, which for context is about the same as the degree to which the number of spots on a dog affects its friskiness." But there are many statistics that are much higher than you would intuitively think, and many other statistics that are much lower than you would intuitively think. A dishonest person can use one of these for "context", and then you will incorrectly think the effect is very high or very low. https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/attempts-to-put-statistics-in-context Ā
No persons identified in this episode.
This episode hasn't been transcribed yet
Help us prioritize this episode for transcription by upvoting it.
Popular episodes get transcribed faster
Other episodes from Astral Codex Ten Podcast
Transcribed and ready to explore now
Your Review: Joan of Arc
07 Aug 2025
Astral Codex Ten Podcast
Book Review: Selfish Reasons To Have More Kids
03 Jun 2025
Astral Codex Ten Podcast
Links For February 2025
11 Mar 2025
Astral Codex Ten Podcast
The Emotional Support Animal Racket
28 May 2024
Astral Codex Ten Podcast
The Psychopolitics Of Trauma
27 Jan 2024
Astral Codex Ten Podcast
Book Review: A Clinical Introduction To Lacanian Psychoanalysis
27 Apr 2022
Astral Codex Ten Podcast