Recently we've gotten into discussions about artistic taste (see comments on AI Art Turing Test and From Bauhaus To Our House). This is a bit mysterious. Many (most?) uneducated people like certain art which seems "obviously" pretty. But a small group of people who have studied the issue in depth say that in some deep sense, that art is actually bad ("kitsch"), and other art which normal people don't appreciate is better. They can usually point to criteria which the "sophisticated" art follows and the "kitsch" art doesn't, but to normal people these just seem like lists of pointless rules. But most of the critics aren't Platonists - they don't believe that aesthetics are an objective good determined by God. So what does it mean to say that someone else is wrong? Most of the comments discussion devolved into analogies - some friendly to the idea of "superior taste", others hostile. Here are some that I find especially helpful: https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/friendly-and-hostile-analogies-for
No persons identified in this episode.
This episode hasn't been transcribed yet
Help us prioritize this episode for transcription by upvoting it.
Popular episodes get transcribed faster
Other episodes from Astral Codex Ten Podcast
Transcribed and ready to explore now
Your Review: Joan of Arc
07 Aug 2025
Astral Codex Ten Podcast
Book Review: Selfish Reasons To Have More Kids
03 Jun 2025
Astral Codex Ten Podcast
Links For February 2025
11 Mar 2025
Astral Codex Ten Podcast
The Emotional Support Animal Racket
28 May 2024
Astral Codex Ten Podcast
The Psychopolitics Of Trauma
27 Jan 2024
Astral Codex Ten Podcast
Book Review: A Clinical Introduction To Lacanian Psychoanalysis
27 Apr 2022
Astral Codex Ten Podcast