Episode 7 - Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury

episode

Bad Reviews for Good Books not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

A.I. Safety Goes Mainstream + a ‘Hard Fork’ Exit AMA 1h 25m · 18 Sep 2026 · Hard Fork

Layoffs at the Kansas City Star will hurt local communities 15 min · 18 Sep 2026 · Kansas City Today

AWP: Beyond the Exam Room: Purpose, Myopia, and Population Health 54 min · 17 Sep 2026 · EyeCode Media

Planning Commission Meeting - Sep 17, 2026 1h 11m · 17 Sep 2026 · Leesburg Planning Commission

Heritage Commission - Sep 14, 2026 1h 57m · 17 Sep 2026 · Loudoun County Board Committees and Advisory Boards

Historic District Review Committee - Sep 14, 2026 1h 36m · 17 Sep 2026 · Loudoun County Board Committees and Advisory Boards

Report any issue

Source

Recorded28 Jul 2021

Publisheranchor.fm ↗

Handlerec:1021897

Show notes

Do you love hearing scathing book reviews? Yes? Then, listen on! No? You listen on as well! In this episode of Bad Reviews for Good Books, (or, as the Hancocks like to call it this week, Bad Reviews for Bad Books) Ryan and Jaida Hancock commentate on what reviewers hated about the the classic novel, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. Enjoy! If you get a chance, the Hancocks would LOVE for you to do one or all of the following: 1. Rate and review the podcast-- it really helps! 2. Leave an anchor message, so the Hancocks can adore you even more ;) 3. Contact the Hancocks at https://www.anuncommonauthor.com/contact 4. Reach out to Jaida on Twitter @Jaida_Hancock

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in