Let's talk about Canadians saying it’s not the Trump tariffs....

episode
Belle of the Ranch 4 min 1 speaker 6 chapters transcribed 1 month ago
▲ 0

Transcript

jump: chapters · speakers · find in transcript
Transcript

Transcript generated automatically by AI and may contain errors.

What is the main premise behind Canadians saying it’s not the Trump tariffs?

Belle of the Ranch 0:01
Well, howdy there internet people it spell again. So today we're going to talk about Canadians saying it's not the Trump tariffs. This is another video where we're answering two questions that are different, one from an American and one from a Canadian. But have the same answer. Question one. After watching some of your videos, I had Canadian YouTube channels show up in my feed. They're all saying it's not about the tariffs, and they go out of their way to point out when American creators acknowledge this. What I don't understand is that this all started with the tariffs which So I'm not sure what I'm missing, said

Why do American news cycles simplify the tariff‑boycott storyline?

Belle of the Ranch 0:47
Question two. Why can't Americans understand that it's not the there's another word here tariffs? Okay. So first question first. Part of this misunderstanding is the way the American news cycle functions. It likes storylines, so A leads to B. Adding additional context when the situation changes isn't something major networks do. In fact, it's part of the reason this channel does well. The boycott started to some degree as soon as Trump started talking about tariffs.

How did Trump’s tariff rhetoric trigger the initial Canadian boycott?

Belle of the Ranch 1:24
A leads to B. That's the storyline, and it's true enough. But the real storyline is talk of tariffs led to boycotts. Then Trump started the fifty first state stuff, and it was perceived as a real threat of annexation. That made the boycotts so much more widespread. So it's A leads to B plus C leads to B times a hundred. Then a lot of Canadians were not happy with new restrictions at the border. This is part of the reason the early estimates about the economic damage being caused by the boycotts are so far off. If you missed that video.

What evidence shows the boycott’s economic impact on travel and tourism?

Belle of the Ranch 2:04
The original estimate of travelers to the US lost due to the tariffs for the entire year happened in just two summer months. The boycott got more widespread, and I haven't seen any numbers suggesting it slowing at all. If anything, it looks like it's still growing. We aren't seeing direct impacts of the policies show up in numbers yet. But just like we talked about soybeans long before it started to show, it will. And to be honest, the soybean damage hasn't actually shown in the numbers yet officially. There's just no orders, so it can't be denied anymore. There's going to be major losses in jobs and tourism dollars. And honestly, at this point, there's no stopping the short-term pain.

Why haven’t the full economic damages of the boycott appeared in official numbers yet?

Belle of the Ranch 2:54
There's a closing window to prevent it from becoming deep permanent damage. I don't see any effort from the administration to try to alter course. On to question two. Just like answer one, our news cycles aren't great at adding in new developments when it doesn't change the outcome. Making it worse doesn't really count, said And then there's two other reasons. One, most Americans never believed we were going to annex Canada. Trump's statements were blown off as an old man yelling at the clouds. So that reason is dismissed as a possible motivation.

What cultural and monetary factors prevent Americans from understanding the boycott’s root cause?

Belle of the Ranch 3:34
Then the second one. We're the US. We put the dollar into idolatry. So many of our national decisions are motivated by money, that it's hard sometimes to see another motive if there's a monetary one available. For Americans, especially those on the border. I wouldn't plan for the downturn you're seeing to go away without a big change in US policy. And even then There's no guarantee. Anyway, it's just a thought, y'all have a good day.

Select any passage to copy it with its citation or turn it into a shareable card.

More from Belle of the Ranch