Let's talk about SCOTUS stopping SNAP for Trump....

episode
Belle of the Ranch 3 min 1 speaker 5 chapters transcribed 1 month ago
▲ 0

Transcript

jump: chapters · speakers · find in transcript
Transcript

Transcript generated automatically by AI and may contain errors.

What is the background of the federal judge’s SNAP order against the Trump administration?

Belle of the Ranch 0:01
Well, howdy there, internet people, it's Belle again. So today, we're going to talk about SCOTUS blocking Snap for Trump. Quick recap. A federal judge was presiding over a case about SNAP and seemed to believe the Trump administration was stalling for political reasons. The judge ordered the administration to immediately fund Snap by Friday. There are signs the administration started to comply while also pursuing its appeals. So first, the administration went to the Boston based appeals court to try to get them to put an emergency hold on the order.

How did the Trump administration attempt to block the SNAP order through the appeals court?

Belle of the Ranch 0:43
As predicted, that court was basically like nope. The administration then went to the Supreme Court emergency appeal to temporarily block the court order. They got it. The block is in place until forty eight hours after the appeals court rules on whether or not to have a more permanent block. The additional time is to give Trump a chance to go back to the Supreme Court after the appeals court rules. When we said to plan like you wouldn't get the money until it was actually on your card. This was one of the scenarios we were concerned about.

Why did the Supreme Court grant an emergency stay on the SNAP funding order?

Belle of the Ranch 1:23
It was a possibility the court system would work this fast. Some states have reportedly already started putting money on cards, but there's no telling how much this will alter the plans of those and other states. Snap helps feed forty-two million Americans. Most of whom are children, the elderly, and people with disabilities. In a recent video on the other channel, I remarked about the Orphan Starver 2000. While most people got it, I got a little pushback, saying it was over the top. Was it though?

What are the potential effects of the SNAP funding delay on 42 million Americans?

Belle of the Ranch 2:02
That video is just a couple of days old, and now the Trump administration has gone all the way to the Supreme Court to try to avoid helping feed sixteen million children. Let's be clear, a normal presidency would have loved to get a court order to allow them to feed the nation's children. Trump's administration is fighting it. That will forever be part of the Trump legacy. This administration fought against a court order that gave them a way to feed America's children. It'll be in the history books. It very well may be part of the defining legacy of MAGA.

How might this legal fight shape the legacy of the Trump administration and future SNAP policy?

Belle of the Ranch 2:43
Shortly after Trump attended a Great Gatsby party while building a ballroom for more parties for the rich, during the longest government shutdown in American history. While there was a shaky economy, and consumer confidence is near record lows, with inflation above target. Less than three weeks before Thanksgiving, the Trump administration went all the way to the Supreme Court to try to avoid helping tens of millions of Americans eat. Mark my words. That's going to make the history books. Remember this while you're celebrating the American mythology surrounding Thanksgiving. Anyway. It's just a thought. We all have a good day.

Select any passage to copy it with its citation or turn it into a shareable card.

More from Belle of the Ranch