Let's talk about the Trump admin charging Leticia James....
episodeTranscript
jump: chapters · speakers · find in transcriptTranscript
Transcript generated automatically by AI and may contain errors.
What is the Trump administration’s indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James?
Well, howdy there, internet people, it's Belle again. So today we're going to talk about the Trump administration charging Letitia James. According to reporting, a federal grand jury indicted Letitia James, the current New York Attorney General, on Thursday for bank fraud related to the much discussed mortgage application. James released a recorded statement, saying quote This is nothing more than a continuation of the president's desperate weaponization of our justice system. He is forcing federal law enforcement agencies to do his bidding. All because I did my job as the New York State Attorney General. James, as Attorney General of New York, was responsible for the civil lawsuit against the Trump organization, and worked alongside the Manhattan DA's office in the criminal investigation.
In her statement, she went on.
How does Letitia James describe the charges as political retaliation?
Quote. These charges are baseless, and the president's own public statements make clear that his only goal is political retribution at any cost. The president's actions are a grave violation of our constitutional order and have drawn sharp criticism from members of both parties. When it comes to the idea that it's political retribution, Trump didn't do himself any favors by posting to social media, quote Pam, I have reviewed over 30 statements and posts saying that essentially, same old story as last time. All talk, no action. Nothing is being done. What about Come? Adam's shifty shift, Letitia.
Why do critics say the prosecution violates the rule of law and constitutional norms?
They're all guilty as heck. But nothing is going to be done. Then we almost put in a Democrat supported US attorney in Virginia. With a really bad Republican past, a woke rhino, who was never going to do his job. That's why two of the worst dem senators pushed him so hard. He even lied to the media and said he quit, and that we had no case. No, I fired him. And there is a great case, and many lawyers and legal pundits say so. Lindsay Halligan is a really good lawyer and likes you a lot.
What evidence do legal experts cite about the mortgage‑application documents?
We can't delay any longer. It's killing our reputation and credibility. They impeached me twice and indicted me five times, over nothing. Justice must be served now and President DJ T. The blending of public opinion with partisan concerns isn't a good look here. It's also not helpful for Trump when there have been multiple firings of prosecutors and the reporting says that the initial prosecutor over this case didn't believe there was enough probable cause to charge her. The documents themselves present an issue because while there is one document that suggests the home in question would be a primary residence, The other documents make it clear it wasn't.
What are the next steps and how will the case likely unfold?
A lawyer for James said We are deeply concerned that this case is driven by President Trump's desire for revenge. When a president can publicly direct charges to be filed against someone. When it was reported that career attorneys concluded none were warranted. It marks a serious attack on the rule of law. We will fight these charges in every process allowed in the law. There will certainly be more information coming soon. But as of right now. What we know is that the Trump administration is moving forward with the prosecution. We'll let you know more as we do. Anyway, it's just a thought. Y'all have a good day.
No segments match your search.
Select any passage to copy it with its citation or turn it into a shareable card.
Chapters
5 chapters
1
What is the Trump administration’s indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James?
0:01–1:07
2
How does Letitia James describe the charges as political retaliation?
1:07–1:55
3
Why do critics say the prosecution violates the rule of law and constitutional norms?
1:55–2:34
4
What evidence do legal experts cite about the mortgage‑application documents?
2:34–3:26
5
What are the next steps and how will the case likely unfold?
3:26–4:13
Speakers
1 identifiedMore from Belle of the Ranch
Let's talk about Trump vs Smokey Bear....
Let's talk about Trump blocking the strait after failing to get a peace deal....
Let's talk about Trump’s record low consumer sentiment....
Let's talk about Trump, Iran, tolls in the strait of Hormuz, and what it all means....
Let's talk about Trump, Madman theory, and the search for reason....
Let's talk about more bad news for Trump’s midterms....