Let's talk about Trump, how ‘political opposition is not rebellion,' and Chicago....
episodeTranscript
jump: chapters · speakers · find in transcriptTranscript
Transcript generated automatically by AI and may contain errors.
What did the appeals court decide about Trump's National Guard deployment in Chicago?
Well, howdy there internet people it's Bel again. So today we're going to talk about Trump Chicago and how political opposition is not rebellion. On Thursday, an appeals court handed Trump a major loss when it upheld a federal judge's order temporarily blocking the Trump administration from deploying hundreds of National Guard troops into Chicago. The appeals court said quote Political opposition is not rebellion. The three judge panel, rejecting Trump's argument, was unanimous in their decision. Two of three judges were appointed by Republicans. Rovner by former President George H.W.
How did the judges define the difference between political opposition and rebellion?
Bush, Hamilton by Obama, and St. Eve was appointed by well, Trump. We're going to go over their decision because it will probably end up being a standard. And it reinforces a lot of the general guidelines we've talked about on the channel. The panel said that even when substantially deferring to Trump's claim. Quote. We conclude that the District Court's factual findings at this preliminary stage were not clearly erroneous, and that the facts do not justify the president's actions in Illinois. The court also noted that Trump has not been quote.
Why are protests not considered rebellions under the court’s ruling?
Unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States. As we've discussed in the videos going over how the laws governing the deployment of troops within the US work. The inability of the courts to function is generally held as a clear line. And the courts are still functioning. The panel flatly rejected Trump's framing of events, saying quote. A protest does not become a rebellion merely because the protesters advocate for myriad legal or policy changes, are well organized, call for significant changes to the structure of the U.S. government, use civil disobedience as a form of protest, or exercise their Second Amendment right to carry firearms as the law currently allows. Nor does a protest become a rebellion merely because of sporadic and isolated incidents of unlawful activity, or even violence committed by rogue participants in the protest.
What legal precedents does the decision reinforce about using the military domestically?
Such conduct exceeds the scope of the First Amendment, of course. And law enforcement has apprehended the perpetrators accordingly. But because rebellions at least use deliberate, organized violence to resist governmental authority. The problematic incidents in this record clearly fall within the considerable daylight between protected speech and rebellion. Further, they wrote the The spirited, sustained and occasionally violent actions of demonstrators and protests of the federal government's immigration policies and actions, without more, does not give rise to a danger of rebellion against the government's authority. Ciao. What do we have with the decision?
What are the practical implications of the ruling for future Trump administration actions in Illinois?
We have a panel of judges who are clearly following the established lines that have long kept the military from being used against Americans. None of the court's decisions is really new. It's the same guidelines we've gone over before, said But most of the decisions establishing those guidelines were Well, let's just call them dated. It's nice to see them reinforced. At the end, the quote that matters the most is quote. The administration remains barred from deploying the National Guard of the United States within Illinois. Anyway, it's just a thought y'all have a good day.
No segments match your search.
Select any passage to copy it with its citation or turn it into a shareable card.
Chapters
5 chapters
1
What did the appeals court decide about Trump's National Guard deployment in Chicago?
0:01–0:47
2
How did the judges define the difference between political opposition and rebellion?
0:47–1:29
3
Why are protests not considered rebellions under the court’s ruling?
1:29–2:34
4
What legal precedents does the decision reinforce about using the military domestically?
2:34–3:23
5
What are the practical implications of the ruling for future Trump administration actions in Illinois?
3:23–4:05
Speakers
1 identifiedMore from Belle of the Ranch
Let's talk about Trump vs Smokey Bear....
Let's talk about Trump blocking the strait after failing to get a peace deal....
Let's talk about Trump’s record low consumer sentiment....
Let's talk about Trump, Iran, tolls in the strait of Hormuz, and what it all means....
Let's talk about Trump, Madman theory, and the search for reason....
Let's talk about more bad news for Trump’s midterms....