#22 Award Criteria Under the Magnifying Glass & Rasmus’ Advice for PhDs

episode

BESTEK - The Public Procurement Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Day 263: The Father's Generosity (2026) 27 min · 20 Sep 2026 · The Bible in a Year (with Fr. Mike Schmitz)

Day 263: The Luminous Mysteries 12 min · 20 Sep 2026 · The Rosary in a Year (with Fr. Mark-Mary Ames)

NPR News: 09-20-2026 3AM EDT 5 min · 20 Sep 2026 · NPR News Now

Dave Wood: Be Your Own Voice - Pressure, Performance & Knowing When to Pull Back 1h 45m · 20 Sep 2026 · Between Two Beers Podcast

3AM ET 09/20/2026 Newscast 3 min · 20 Sep 2026 · Fox News Hourly Update

E499 Symbiotic Snack Partners and Peppermint Pattie Problems (feat. Guest Host Bethany Watson) 2h 51m · 20 Sep 2026 · And That's Why We Drink

Report any issue

Source

Recorded06 Sep 2022

Publisherbestek-procurement.com ↗

Handlerec:6798966

Show notes

In this episode, Marta, Willem, and their guest, dr. Rasmus Horskjær Nielsen discuss award criteria and evaluation methods in public procurements. In doing so, Rasmus explains the difference between relevant and controllable competition concepts. In addition, they debate whether there is such a thing as objective criteria For the dessert, you can hear what Rasmus would do differently if he did his PhD again.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in