Inside IP Mini-Podcast Series Episode 4: “If the shoe fits…copyright protection for designs in Germany and the UK”

episode

Bird & Bird Podcasts not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Stalingrad Of The Adriatic: The Sangro (Part 1) 52 min · 23 Sep 2026 · WW2 Pod: We Have Ways of Making You Talk

7PM ET 09/23/2026 Newscast 3 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Fox News Hourly Update

Richard’s Top 3 Music Videos Of All Time 35 min · 23 Sep 2026 · The Rest Is Entertainment

Ant Forgets Dec’s Birthday 🎂😬 57 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Hanging Out With Ant & Dec

Would Sam & Pete Betray Each Other on Celebrity Traitors?! 37 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Staying Relevant

Rights for the Unborn: How Should We Protect Future Generations? (Sophie Howe) 45 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Radical

Report any issue

Source

Recorded15 Jul 2025

Publisherfeeds.soundcloud.com ↗

Handlerec:3322188

Show notes

In the next episode of our podcast series, join Richard Dissmann (partner, Munich) and William Wortley (associate, London/Munich) as they discuss one of the most contentious copyright questions of recent years: what copyright protection should be given to works of applied art? Richard gives an overview of the legal landscape following a series of decisions from the CJEU in recent years, and he and William compare the German and British approaches following the recent Birkenstock and Waterrower decisions. Hot on the heels of the AG Opinion in Mio/Konektra, this timely discussion is not something you will want to miss.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in