Collision Course: The Darcy Allan Sheppard Case [3]

episode

Canadian True Crime not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from Canadian True Crime

Behind the scenes on The Social: When the media gets it right 17 min · 31 Jul 2026

The Murder of Rhoderie Estrada 1h 25m · 14 Jul 2026

Jacob Hoggard finally admits the truth 1h 16m · 06 Jul 2026

All episodes from Canadian True Crime →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded22 Aug 2024

Publisherfeeds.acast.com ↗

Handlerec:8338516

Show notes

[Part 3 of 4] How the Justice System Failed. The controversial 2010 hearing where the prosecutor announced his decision to withdraw charges. While Darcy’s father expected that result, something seemed significantly wrong with how the prosecutor chose to explain how the decision was made. In this new four-part series, edited and re-mastered, you’ll hear a story of elites vs peasants, cars vs bicycles, and wealth and privilege vs poverty and crime. It’s a cautionary tale of how justice works differently in this country for some people.Special thanks to Allan Sheppard, Joe Hendry and Victoria (the eyewitness). Thanks also to writer Mary Fairhurst Breen for editing and creative direction on this reboot series.Please respect the privacy of those involved in this case.Look out for early, ad-free release on CTC premium feeds: available on Amazon Music (included with Prime), Apple Podcasts, Patreon and Supercast.Full list of resources, information sources, credits and music credits:See the page for this episode at www.canadiantruecrime.ca/episodes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.