173. ¿Es obligatorio usar un diferencial negativo con el IRPH?

episode

Charlando por Derecho - El podcast jurídico not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Can Toia Shut Herbie Down? Penrith's Vulnerable State & Moses' Lebanon Exit!| NRL Daily 47 min · 24 Sep 2026 · Triple M Rocks Footy NRL

Ask, Tell, Confess: I Can't Believe He CHEATED?! 31 min · 24 Sep 2026 · Dumb Blonde

NPR News: 09-23-2026 10PM EDT 4 min · 24 Sep 2026 · NPR News Now

10PM ET 09/23/2026 Newscast 3 min · 24 Sep 2026 · Fox News Hourly Update

Xi in Washington, US-China Trade Truce Extended, More 8 min · 24 Sep 2026 · Bloomberg News Now

Whateley in a Snapshot | Thursday (24.09.26) 6 min · 24 Sep 2026 · Whateley

Report any issue

Source

Recorded10 Nov 2023

Publisherfeeds.feedburner.com ↗

Handlerec:4204005

Show notes

#IRPH #TribunalSupremo #Banca #TJUE #Diferencial El uso del diferencial negativo y la relevancia que tiene para enjuiciar el IRPH es algo que con la última sentencia del TJUE ha cobrado especial importancia, pero ¿es obligatorio usar ese diferencial negativo con el IRPH? Consulta gratuita: https://www.iurisfirma.es/reserva-tu-cita-sobre-clausulas-abusivas/ Javier Fuentes Abril (Abogado)

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in