Property Patter: Just how protected are Rent Act and Assured Tenants?

episode

Charles Russell Speechlys Podcast Channel not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

A.I. Safety Goes Mainstream + a ‘Hard Fork’ Exit AMA 1h 25m · 18 Sep 2026 · Hard Fork

Layoffs at the Kansas City Star will hurt local communities 15 min · 18 Sep 2026 · Kansas City Today

AWP: Beyond the Exam Room: Purpose, Myopia, and Population Health 54 min · 17 Sep 2026 · EyeCode Media

Hour 3 – Bears Are All O and No D, Andrew Whitworth 1h 2m · 17 Sep 2026 · The Dan Patrick Show

The Best of The Dan Patrick Show 1h 2m · 17 Sep 2026 · The Dan Patrick Show

Win Brooke's Bucks (9/17/26) 11 min · 17 Sep 2026 · Brooke and Jeffrey

Report any issue

Source

Recorded23 Nov 2021

Publisherfeed.podbean.com ↗

Handlerec:11141943

Show notes

Landlords of residential property can still come across Rent Act and Assured Tenancies, and can struggle with the difficulties they can cause when it comes to regaining possession. Emma Humphreys and Joseph Green are joined by Richard Granby of Tanfield Chambers to look at how and when can courts be persuaded that tenants are no longer entitled to enjoy the protection of these tenancies. The cases referred to in this podcast are: M Brown Limited v. Bestwick [1951] 1 KB 21 Tickner v. Hearn [1961] 1 All ER 65 Richards v. Green [1984] 11 HLR 1 Moreland Property v. Dhokia [2003] EWCA Civ 1639 Gofor Investments v. Roberts [1975] 1 WLUK 727

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in