The Trump administration's airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites did not destroy Iran's nuclear capacity, despite President Trump's claims that they had been "totally obliterated."Reports from intelligence assessments and nuclear experts indicate that while the strikes damaged Iran's nuclear infrastructure, they did not eliminate its ability to restart enrichment activities. A classified U.S. intelligence report suggests that key components of Iran's nuclear program, including centrifuges, remain largely intact, and Iran had moved enriched uranium to undisclosed locations before the strikes.F urthermore, experts warn that the attacks may have pushed Iran closer to withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), potentially accelerating its nuclear ambitions rather than halting them. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has stated that a full assessment of the damage is still pending, and no independent verification has confirmed Trump's assertion that Iran's nuclear program was "obliterated"4. This discrepancy between Trump's statements and intelligence assessments has led to skepticism among analysts and policymakers, with concerns that the strikes may have only delayed Iran's nuclear progress rather than stopping it entirelyBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/conspiracy-theories-exploring-the-unseen--5194379/support.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.