CISA Domain 4: Business Continuity & DR GovernanceThis episode is part of the CISA Audit Judgment Series — a structured learning path focused on Domains 4 and 5, the heaviest-weighted areas of the CISA exam.In this episode, we analyze a Disaster Recovery test that was declared “successful” — even though no real failover occurred, no production data was restored, and no business validation took place. The test passed on paper, but not in reality. This scenario exposes a major gap in operational resilience maturity.You’ll learn:✔ Why CISA focuses on DR test evidence, not documentation✔ Why DR tests fail despite official reports showing success✔ How junior auditors interpret DR vs. how audit leaders evaluate capability✔ What evidence auditors must review for DR governance✔ How to assess RTO/RPO validation, test scope, and business involvement✔ What CISA is actually testing in continuity and recovery questions✔ The risks when DR tests pass on paper but fail in practiceThis episode teaches CISA exam judgment and real audit leadership — the core of the CyberLex Audit Judgment Series.If you’re preparing for CISA or sharpening your audit judgment,explore the CISA Gold Standard Series by M.G. Vance on Amazon.📘 Amazon link: ⁠https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FX526S3V⁠We don’t just help you pass.We prepare you to become formidable in the field.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related