In this second conversation with my good friend Jordan Grant (link to our first conversation below), we cover a few more logical fallacies and then dive into a conversation about the difference between ‘scientific realism’ and ‘instrumentalism’. But this is no dry philosophical discussion.As ‘big picture’ people, Jordan and I are both keen to help people understand the importance of getting to the root of the question/situation and of asking pertinent questions, especially in the field of health, in which our decisions can have consequences for our whole lives.As Jordan has said “We have to have a standard for evaluating claims”.Join us for another fascinating conversation about how we can know what we think we know and more…Dawn 🌹Our previous conversation,RESOURCESDr Jordan Grant’s website: https://www.granthormone.com/Thank you for your support. 🙏Podcast music: Unique track composed by Alex Michael, aka Conspiracy Music GuruVideo Intro: Unique creation by Steve Falconer of SpacebustersDawn’s Writings is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Disclaimer:The information provided and the views expressed by me and/or my guests are to be recognised as the result of research and investigation and are not to be construed as providing ‘medical’ or any other form of ‘advice’.Listeners are recommended to do their own research and encouraged to draw their own conclusions.Any links are provided for information purposes and should not to be construed as recommendations. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit dawnlester.substack.com/subscribe

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related