Following Brexit, Britain has expressed a desire to play an important new role in world affairs. The idea of "Global Britain" has thus made a comeback with free trade as its core element. Indeed, Global Britain appears to be a catchy label for the UK’s ambition to look beyond Europe for new commercial opportunities and pathways to global influence. But critics argue that “A positive image of Global Britain must be earned, not declared.” And that the narrative of Global Britain will only be meaningful if and when the ambitious vision is backed up with extra investments. Of particular concern to the global development community has been the recent cuts to the UK’s aid budget, which some argue will adversely affect Britain’s power and global influence. There has also been considerable criticism of the government’s decision to merge the Department for International Development (or DFID) with the Foreign Office.Mark Miller is the director of the Overseas Development Institute’s work on development and public finance. His research interests include how states can build the capabilities to effectively manage their public finances and the future of development cooperation in the UK. A year of G7 British leadership– delivering on Global BritainLessons from the UK spending reviewBringing global development closer to homeUK aid cut seen as unforced error in ‘year of British leadership’Reasons for optimism over the UK's Integrated ReviewTwitter: Mark Miller, Dan Banik, In Pursuit of Development https://in-pursuit-of-development.simplecast.com/ Host:Dan Banik LinkedInX: @danbanik @GlobalDevPod Subscribe:Apple Spotify YouTubehttps://in-pursuit-of-development.simplecast.com

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related