“The hard part isn’t noticing when papers are bad, it’s deciding what to do afterwards” by LawrenceC

episode

LessWrong (30+ Karma) not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from LessWrong (30+ Karma)

“Claude Opus 4.5 Achieves 50%-Time Horizon Of Around 4 hrs 49 Mins” by Michaël Trazzi 3 min · 20 Dec 2025

All episodes from LessWrong (30+ Karma) →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded08 Apr 2026

Publisherfeeds.type3.audio ↗

Handlerec:17762364

Show notes

Written (very) quickly for the Inkhaven Residency. I used to hate the classic management adage of “bring me solutions, not problems”. After all, identifying problems is the first step of solving them, and clearly understanding a problem is often a substantial part of the difficulty of solving it. (It also doesn’t help that I’ve sat in on many modern management classes where this adage was treated as obviously wrong and outdated.) But over time, I’ve realized the adage contains some amount of wisdom, at least in the context of research. The interesting question is rarely if a thing is bad, but instead about how bad it really is, and what to do afterwards. When I was in middle and high school, I loved memorizing logical fallacies, and spotting them in the arguments made by others. “That's an appeal to authority!”, I’d think in my head. “Dismissed!” (Yes, I was indeed an annoying debate kid.) Thankfully, as I grew up, I realized that it often matters to figure out what is actually true, rather than scoring points against imagined or real debate opponents. The interesting question in debates is often what is actually true, and not how hard you [...] --- First published: April 7th, 2026 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/qcJ7eWQtREyKwwGEk/the-hard-part-isn-t-noticing-when-papers-are-bad-it-s --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.