RED-SPINEL - Episode 7: Making sense of the EU's Supranational Instruments

episode

Making sense of EU - Institut d'études européennes of the ULB not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from Making sense of EU - Institut d'études européennes of the ULB

Making Sense of EU - NAVIGATOR - S2, E3: Cybersecurity in the Age of AI (Tokyo Conversations Series) 10 min · 11 Aug 2026

Talking with EU - episode 16: "Young, European and free: rights, opportunities and voices of young Europeans" 23 min · 16 Jul 2026

Talking with EU - episode 15: The EU as a global actor: the need to uphold human rights in a time of polycrisis and international insecurity 32 min · 28 May 2026

Making Sense of the EU - NAVIGATOR - Episode 6: Democratic backsliding, illiberal regimes and international cooperation under pressure 34 min · 15 Dec 2025

All episodes from Making sense of EU - Institut d'études européennes of the ULB →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded05 Jun 2024

Publisherfeed.ausha.co ↗

Handlerec:2393473

Show notes

In this seventh and last episode of the RED-SPINEL season of Making Sense of EU, we are delighted to welcome both Professor Ramona Coman of the Institut d’études européennes in Brussels, and Professor Daniel Kelemen of Georgetown University in Washington DC. To wrap up this first series of episodes exploring the nature of dissensus surrounding liberal democracy, we chose to focus our discussions on the relative efficiency and legitimacy of EU instruments specifically set up to strengthen both the rule of law and democratic principles.On the eve of the 2024 European elections, the time is ripe to take a step back and assess how EU actions over the past decade have impacted the relative health of liberal democracy and the Rule of Law in Europe. Building on the previous six episodes, the season’s finale will bring in two new elements: an expert American perspective on the challenges facing European liberal democracy and the rule of law, on the one hand; and a renewed focus on the institutions and instruments of the EU, on the other. As a result, this episode hopes to broaden the series' perspective as it introduces an extra-European point of view, while further homing in on how EU institutions in particular have fared in an environment characterized by ever-increasing dissensus.Hosted by Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.