Obviousness Responses - Secondary Considerations. EP049

episode

Patenting for Inventors not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

NPR News: 09-27-2026 3AM EDT 5 min · 27 Sep 2026 · NPR News Now

3AM ET 09/27/2026 Newscast 3 min · 27 Sep 2026 · Fox News Hourly Update

11 Stoic Lessons Ryan Learned in Rome 22 min · 27 Sep 2026 · The Daily Stoic

Episode 392 - The Great Amherst Mystery | A True Poltergeist Horror Story 1h 14m · 27 Sep 2026 · Two Girls One Ghost

Can clergy candidates help Democrats win in red states? 35 min · 27 Sep 2026 · Up First from NPR

Day 270 (Nehemiah 6-7) - Year 8 5 min · 27 Sep 2026 · The Bible Recap

Report any issue

Source

Recorded11 Nov 2018

Publisherpatentingforinventors.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:1497988

Show notes

In this episode I go through how to respond to obviousness rejections by using secondary considerations. Secondary considerations for non-obviousness include reasons for patentability, including: commercial success, long felt but unsolved need, failure of others, skepticism by experts, praise by others, teaching away, copying by others, synergistic effects, inoperative combination, and lack of suggestion.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in