How Pete Blair scored 100% in a deception detection study

episode

People Who Read People: A Behavior and Psychology Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

AWP: Beyond the Exam Room: Purpose, Myopia, and Population Health 54 min · 17 Sep 2026 · EyeCode Media

Essentials: How to Assess & Improve All Aspects of Your Fitness | Dr. Andy Galpin 35 min · 17 Sep 2026 · Huberman Lab

#502 – Psychiatry, Insane Asylums, Mental Illness, ECT, Lobotomies, Freud & Jung 3h 43m · 17 Sep 2026 · Lex Fridman Podcast

September 16, 2026 PC - Sep 16, 2026 1h 50m · 16 Sep 2026 · Fairfax County Planning Commission

Planning Commision 09/16/2026 - Sep 16, 2026 56 min · 16 Sep 2026 · Prince William County Planning Commission

Western Loudoun Rural Uses and Standards PCZOC Ad Hoc Meeting 2 - Sep 16, 2026 4h 45m · 16 Sep 2026 · Loudoun County Board Committees and Advisory Boards

Report any issue

Source

Recorded24 Jul 2026

Publisherfeeds.megaphone.fm ↗

Handlerec:20339002

Show notes

In a 2014 deception detection study, Pete Blair made 33 judgments—and got all 33 right. That paper was titled “Expertise in deception detection involves actively prompting diagnostic information rather than passive behavioral observation.” I ask Pete about what the factors were in him getting 100% accuracy in that study, and we talk about the interplay between verbal and nonverbal behavior. Pete talks about the importance of context and domain knowledge in making high-confidence judgments, and he discusses how such insights will sometimes be based on aspects that we aren’t consciously aware of. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in