Jennifer Saul on Implicit Bias

episode

Philosophy Bites not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

NPR News: 09-22-2026 12PM EDT 5 min · 22 Sep 2026 · NPR News Now

12PM ET 09/22/2026 Newscast 3 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Fox News Hourly Update

Des Décisions Difficiles À Venir Pour Le Canadien | Le Sick Podcast Avec Tony Marinaro 22/09/26 1h 31m · 22 Sep 2026 · The Sick Podcast with Tony Marinaro / Le Sick Podcast avec Tony Marinaro

ep 399 | What does a Fed hiking cycle mean for markets? 8 min · 22 Sep 2026 · On Point

Ep. 2065 - How They Legally Killed An 83-Year-Old Grandmother 46 min · 22 Sep 2026 · The Michael Knowles Show

Why can’t we stop the DV crisis? 15 min · 22 Sep 2026 · ABC News Daily

Report any issue

Source

Recorded07 Dec 2013

Publisherphilosophybites.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:5661406

Show notes

Implicit biases are tricky. We all have them, apparently, but we don't realise we have them. What are the implications of these biases? Does it, perhaps, go some way to explaining why there are so few women in academic philosophy? Jennifer Saul discusses these questions with Nigel Warburton in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in