Myisha Cherry on Rage

episode

Philosophy Bites not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

BREAKING: Paramount to Settle Suits Against Warner Bros. Merger 2 min · 21 Sep 2026 · Bloomberg News Now

NPR News: 09-21-2026 10AM EDT 5 min · 21 Sep 2026 · NPR News Now

Kansas Reflector staff recap rowdy state fair debates 30 min · 21 Sep 2026 · Kansas Reflector Podcast

10AM ET 09/21/2026 Newscast 3 min · 21 Sep 2026 · Fox News Hourly Update

Gretta Ray on the heartbreak of severe illness 1h 1m · 21 Sep 2026 · Inherited

Shock Collar Question of the Day (9/21/26) 14 min · 21 Sep 2026 · Brooke and Jeffrey

Report any issue

Source

Recorded03 Nov 2021

Publisherphilosophybites.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:5661288

Show notes

Stoic philosophers described anger as a temporary madness and argued that we should eliminate it wherever possible. More recently Martha Nussbaum has argued for keeping anger out of political debates. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast, in contrast, Myisha Cherry makes the case for rage in some specific circumstances. She discusses rage with Nigel Warburton.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in