Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing
Podcast Image

SaaS Interviews with CEOs, Startups, Founders

1390 With $3m+ in ARR and 300+ Customers, He's Making Digital Advertising Easier for Publishers

15 May 2019

Transcription

Chapter 1: What is Sortable and how does it empower publishers?

1.212 - 21.924 Nathan Latka

Guys, my new book, How to Be a Capitalist Without Any Capital, just hit the Wall Street Journal bestseller list. It's ranking extremely high on Kindle and Audible. And I want to thank you guys for grabbing it. If you haven't bought it yet, here's what James Y. said in an Amazon review on March 8th. He said, literally, a step-by-step blueprint for conquering the world and building your own empire.

0

22.045 - 36.527 Nathan Latka

Five stars. It's a verified purchase. He goes on to say, if you like doing things the hard way, don't read this book. for everyone else who appreciates someone showing you what to do and why it works step by step so you can rinse and repeat and accomplish the same results. Read this book now in all caps.

0

37.027 - 53.312 Nathan Latka

He then says, pro tip, stock up on highlighters while you're adding this to your Amazon cart, you'll be using them. This book should be required reading for every entrepreneur, startup or founder, business person, and human. Seriously, Nathan isn't in a kind of class that cuts through all the bull crap. he used a different word, to show you what you need to do and how to do it.

0

53.673 - 56.958 Nathan Latka

If success came with an instruction manual, this book would be it.

0

Chapter 2: What led to the transition from Snapsort Media to Sortable?

56.978 - 75.581 Nathan Latka

We'll be stocking up and handing these out as Christmas gifts to all my friends and colleagues. If I could give this book a six-star review, I would. From James, James, thank you. All you that listen to the podcast, thank you so much. SaaS founders are loving the book. Go grab an Audible version right now at capitalistbook.com. Go find mentors faster.

0

75.601 - 95.057 Nathan Latka

He had some success with Sortable, selling it early on to a larger company, Rebellion, backed by a private equity firm, then worked in 2014 to spin that back out and really scale it. Now they've got a model, which is essentially a SaaS tonnage fee on a CPM basis and then a rev share basis as well. They've got 300 customers right now, growing 30 to 40% year over year, doing well north.

0

95.037 - 116.86 Nathan Latka

of $3 million in revenue. Net revenue retention annually over 100% with this team of about 60 people between Waterloo and Toronto. Less than six-month payback period too, so healthy economics there. This is the Top Entrepreneurs Podcast, where founders share how they started their companies and got filthy rich or crash and burn.

0

118.072 - 126.889 Nathan Latka

Each episode features revenue numbers, customer counts, and other insider information that creates business news headlines.

0

Chapter 3: How does Sortable utilize machine learning for ad operations?

127.049 - 130.155 Nathan Latka

We went from a couple of hundred thousand dollars to 2.7 million.

0

130.416 - 132.059 Christopher Reid

I had no money when I started the company.

0

132.4 - 156.716 Nathan Latka

It was $160 million, which is the size of many IPOs. We're a bit strapped. We have like 22,000 customers. With over 5 million downloads in a very short amount of time, major outlets like Inc. are calling us the fastest growing business show on iTunes. I'm your host, Nathan Latka, and here's today's episode. Hello, everyone. My guest today is Chris Reid.

0

156.777 - 171.576 Nathan Latka

He's the founder and CEO of Sortable, a Waterloo region startup on a mission to empower publishers. With engineering background from the University of Waterloo, he's a serial entrepreneur on his fifth venture and has led tech ventures in industries ranging from educational technology to the consumer web and B2B SaaS.

0

171.957 - 187.399 Nathan Latka

He's a driving force behind Sortable, which was formerly Snapsort Media, which uses machine learning to help online publishers automate ad operations. Previously a web publishing company, it was acquired in 2011 and bought back in 2014 to relaunch Sortable's current day business. We'll jump into it today.

Chapter 4: What is the revenue model for Sortable's services?

187.519 - 190.223 Nathan Latka

Chris, are you ready to take us to the top?

0

190.243 - 190.924 Christopher Reid

I am. All right.

0

191.004 - 200.378 Nathan Latka

So this is going to be fun. So it sounds like, I mean, did I get this right? You built an agency, you sold it, you didn't like what happened to it, so you bought it back and now it's more pure play SaaS. Is that accurate?

0

203.322 - 204.424 Christopher Reid

No. Give me the update.

0

204.444 - 205.285 Nathan Latka

Give me the accurate version.

205.565 - 233.592 Christopher Reid

Yeah. So we... We built out a publishing business that was consumer-focused, sold it, and wasn't happy with the trajectory we were going on post-acquisition, and so bought it back and largely pivoted to a B2B-focused SaaS company. trying to help publishers. So first company was publishing based.

Chapter 5: How does Sortable achieve net revenue retention above 100%?

233.792 - 240.8 Christopher Reid

We learned a lot of lessons as a publisher and then bought the company back and repivoted towards helping publishers.

0

241.281 - 247.928 Nathan Latka

Okay. So there are, let me, let me break this down for a second. Number one, why'd you stay with the company after the acquisition? Was there an earn out you had to?

0

247.969 - 255.437 Christopher Reid

Yeah. I mean, there's, I think with all acquisitions, there's some, there's some type

0

256.244 - 279.602 Christopher Reid

tie-in you know i think that there's like monetary tie-in stock tie-in and then also um just me wanting to you know finish you know finish the job right there's like a commitment so a lot of reasons and why did it take three years for you to realize your new home wasn't gonna be a good fit and you should spin it back out why not do it immediately or after a year

0

280.544 - 288.937 Christopher Reid

Uh, that's just that I would never do that. Right. I would never sell something and then not, not try and work, make it work for the, uh, for the acquire.

289.097 - 298.651 Nathan Latka

You know, sorry, Chris, I'm not accusing you of doing something unjust. What I'm saying is why did you need a three year cohort sample size? Right. To understand it was never going to work.

Chapter 6: What factors contribute to Sortable's year-over-year growth?

298.731 - 303.278 Nathan Latka

Right. Why not with that? If we go off your current logic, why not stay in? Why didn't you try it for 10 years?

0

304.203 - 333.349 Christopher Reid

Oh, because it was clear. It wasn't clear initially that it wasn't going to work. It took some time, and then it took some time to execute a buyout. I see. Working with private equity firms who have to... Working with the money side is not necessarily easy. So it's like you can kind of break the time up into... We continued to grow the company. It was going well.

0

333.751 - 349.218 Christopher Reid

than a period where it looked like, you know, it wasn't going to be what we thought it would be. And then a period of executing the buyout that, you know, those three things took time. And that's, that's how you get to three years.

0

349.619 - 355.289 Nathan Latka

So how much capital do you need to raise in a roundup from these private equity folks to take it back private?

0

Chapter 7: What challenges did Sortable face during its acquisition and buyback?

0

356.313 - 358.516 Nathan Latka

I mean, are we talking like a million or a hundred million or?

0

359.297 - 369.57 Christopher Reid

So I'm, I'm speaking primarily about negotiating with the PE firm who, who largely controlled us taking it back, not us raising money from private.

0

369.59 - 371.012 Nathan Latka

Oh, you're talking about rebellion directly.

0

371.052 - 376.779 Christopher Reid

I'm talking about the, the PE firm that backed rebellion.

377.34 - 384.97 Nathan Latka

I see. Okay. Rebellion was the company that bought you guys in the first place. You had to kind of get on good terms with them first, negotiate the deal, and then you were able to spin it back out.

385.287 - 393.275 Christopher Reid

Yeah. You have to negotiate both with the choir and with, um, the PE firm who, who, you know, has a lot of say over what, what they do. Got it.

393.295 - 395.257 Nathan Latka

Yep. Okay. Let's focus on the business.

Chapter 8: What future plans does Sortable have for expansion and growth?

395.277 - 398.64 Nathan Latka

So what's the company do? And, and today again, how do you charge, how to make money?

0

400.201 - 416.8 Christopher Reid

So we charge publishers, um, in sort of two models, right? One model is sort of a SAS style tonnage fee. Um, which is on a CPM basis. And then the other, the other way we charge is on a rev share.

0

417.841 - 418.141 Nathan Latka

Okay.

0

418.442 - 420.084 Christopher Reid

Okay. That's how we make money.

0

420.104 - 428.312 Nathan Latka

Great. And is there one, do one of those make up more like the majority of their revenue? So does 80% SAS and 20% is rev share something like that?

428.393 - 458.837 Christopher Reid

Yeah. I mean, ultimately, ultimately it models that like SAS because the way we make money is a function of the amount of advertising someone is doing. So, um, That's a pretty stable input. The input is how many impressions, how many ads are we managing for you? Then the output is we're either charging a fixed amount per ad or we're charging a rev share amount per ad.

460.499 - 482.743 Christopher Reid

We're primarily rev share focused. But the two model really similarly because at some point, a CPM and a rev share are actually the same thing. They're transacted on a per impression basis and they can actually back out the exact same way. So it's really two sides of the same coin.

483.179 - 512.308 Nathan Latka

in turn you know when you say model similar to a sas company you know people like sas because they like predictability right and so they look at things like churn to see is the bucket leaky or is it truly recurring revenue so so if i just ask you just to try to understand this in one metric net revenue retention annually are you guys above 100 percent um i mean in aggregate we we try and look at it across a few cohorts right so that it's like it makes sense um

513.824 - 536.153 Christopher Reid

And I would say yes, because normally in SaaS, you have a lot of upsell opportunity, right? And so that's fairly typical. With us, there is some variability because some publishers grow really quickly. And as they grow, that kind of looks like over 100% retention. But if a publisher shrinks, they don't.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.