Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing
Podcast Image

SaaS Interviews with CEOs, Startups, Founders

1754 Parker Conrad Gave Rippling CTO 40%, Kept 60%, 2,000 Customers "$36m ARR Not Far Off"

13 May 2020

Transcription

Chapter 1: What led Prasanna and Parker to start Rippling?

0.031 - 19.605 Nathan Latka

Prasanna and Parker left Zenefits about the same time back in 2015, 2016. They then jumped into the new company Rippling together, raised 10 million bucks right away. Parker put in about 500 grand. They split equity 60% to Parker, 40% to Prasanna. They're now scaling nicely, trying to be the all-in-one. HR and IT tech platform currently serving 2,000 customers.

0

20.466 - 30.217 Nathan Latka

Persona says 36 million bucks in terms of run rate is not too distant in the future. We'll see how that pans out, but they're again, scaling through all kinds of channels, whether it's resellers or their 20 account executives.

0

30.237 - 44.314 Nathan Latka

They've got a team today of about 300, sorry, 200 people, a hundred of which are engineers, $65 million total raise net revenue retention of over 300%, spending about 10,000 bucks to get a new customer for call it a seven to 14 month payback period.

0

Chapter 2: How did Prasanna and Parker split equity in Rippling?

44.75 - 57.51 Nathan Latka

Hello, everyone. My guest today is Prasanna Sankar. He's building a very cool company called Rippling, which is playing in the all-in-one HR and IT space. He is the CTO. All right, Prasanna, you ready to take us to the top? Yeah.

0

Chapter 3: What is the current scale and customer base of Rippling?

57.971 - 65.543 Nathan Latka

All right. So talk to us. You know, you come from the director of engineering role at Zenefits. So let's pick up there. When did you leave Zenefits?

0

66.518 - 83.886 Prasanna Sankar

So I left right after Parker left. So, you know, when Parker was fired from Zenefits, I wrote him an email saying, hey, dude, like, you know, I know you're going to start a company and I want to join you. And Parker was like, no, no, I'm going to, you know, I'm done. So that's sort of what kicked off, you know, the rippling thing.

0

84.728 - 88.153 Prasanna Sankar

After a month, he was like, yeah, actually, I'm starting a company.

0

88.193 - 91.058 Nathan Latka

So when what what company was that?

0

91.628 - 93.43 Prasanna Sankar

Rippling. Oh, got it.

93.45 - 110.249 Nathan Latka

Got it, very good. So you guys are now working, you're cranking together still today? He's still active at the company? Yes. Very good. Yeah, he's the CEO. So walk us, so how did you guys get connected? So you were, because you kind of came from a competitive background. You were number one in Indie on TopCoder from a competitive programming perspective.

110.289 - 115.495 Nathan Latka

Now, how do you measure competitive programming? Is it number of code, like lines written per minute or what?

117.157 - 138.093 Prasanna Sankar

There are a bunch of online competitive programs you know, contests that run, um, top coder is one Google code jam is one. Um, there is Facebook runs some of those as well. Um, and they have these algorithmic problems that you need to solve in a short period of time. And, you know, they have a way to rank people. So in those contests, I was ranked one in India consistently for a while.

138.854 - 152.637 Nathan Latka

Yep. Okay. So I love this. So you get to get, so Parker says, Hey, I'm going to take a break. I'm going to take a break. He lasts barely a year and he's calls you up and goes, all right, barely a month. Barely a month since Prasanna, I'm jumping back in. So what year was that? When did you guys write the first line of code for this?

Chapter 4: What challenges did Rippling face while building their MVP?

515.021 - 527.791 Prasanna Sankar

And it clearly signals, you know, potentially $100 billion company that could get created. And if you look at all the huge companies that got created, they had these kind of trajectories of growth rates and market pull, which is what we're seeing.

0

528.271 - 557.049 Prasanna Sankar

So it was very clear that this is a huge market with the winner-take-all dynamics, especially the ultimate play is like an app store where any SaaS developer can sort of plug in plug-in and publishes app and, you know, rippling provision seats and licenses on top of this on, you know, and provides distribution for these apps, right? So it is clearly a network effects business.

0

557.089 - 563.44 Prasanna Sankar

It's a winner-take-all business. So, you know, it requires to be number one. You know, it requires you to go for the number one.

0

563.42 - 581.125 Nathan Latka

So as you're going for that number one spot, there's a lot of people that would argue and say whoever can pay the most for the customer, because their economics are strong, will win the customer. So you raise a lot of capital. You have a war chest. Your average first year ACV is, you said, between 15 and 20,000 bucks. What do you spend on fully weighted CAC to get that customer?

0

582.708 - 597.324 Prasanna Sankar

We almost sort of like... Um, our payback is like, you know, is insanely profitable right now. It's like one to two months or something like that. So, you know, uh, it's not, it's not true. That's not the game that we're playing.

597.484 - 601.428 Nathan Latka

You know, that means you're spending two or three grand to get a 15, $20,000 a year customer.

603.59 - 628.999 Prasanna Sankar

Um, actually that's probably not true. It's our sales rep comp that we sort of recoup on the first month. Uh, so our total payback might be like, you know, nine months or something like that. So, yeah. Um, So we're not in the business of paying the most to get the customer at all. We are pretty unique. Nobody else has what we have in terms of product

629.401 - 646.566 Prasanna Sankar

You know, there is no competition in the market that, you know, there is no one else out there going to the customers with the sales pitch that we are going with. But just like we are an all in one solution, we are an operating system to run your company. So, you know, we are pretty differentiated on that.

647.086 - 665.574 Nathan Latka

Well, there's a lot to be fair. There are a lot of companies where the prize is the same $100 billion HR tech kind of store company, but the mousetrap they're using to get there is different. So they today would not describe themselves as all in one. They would say we do this specific thing very well and they're getting a lot of traction there and they will expand to become all in one.

Chapter 5: How does Rippling define its target customer?

816.383 - 831.043 Prasanna Sankar

So we're not really talking about the revenue numbers, but I can tell you that it is sort of the fastest growing company that i've kind of like seen you know we've kept it under the radar um you know it's it's sort of like at slack kind of growth rates

0

831.58 - 846.376 Nathan Latka

Well, Prasanna, so just to be clear, I get people that come on all the time that have raised a lot of capital. They're burning like you wouldn't believe. They say they're the fastest growing. And when you try and get quantification, they go, oh, we're not talking about it. And usually it's bullshit, right?

0

846.436 - 869.707 Nathan Latka

So when I'm looking at, when I'm looking, I never want to bring out a revenue number unless the guest, in this case you, provides the data for me to get to that number. So You know, we have a very sophisticated SaaS audience, very smart people listen, 10 million downloads. They will take 2,000 customers times an ARPU to get MRR. That's how the math works.

0

869.847 - 879.103 Nathan Latka

So I just want to give you one second to potentially correct either of those numbers because that's what's going to happen. They're going to multiply that ACV you said times 2,000 customers and back into 3 million a month in revenue.

0

880.248 - 885.826 Prasanna Sankar

What I would say is all these numbers are shifting really fast. You know, the ACV is growing really fast.

885.946 - 909.056 Nathan Latka

No, but we talked about ARPU though. ARPU is average revenue per user per month. So is what you're saying basically, by the way, I'll move on from this. I just want to quantify this to put an end on this part of the story, right? What I hear you saying is you're moving upstream, which means your new ACV today might be $20,000 ACVs, but you might have historical cohorts that paid less than that.

909.456 - 915.486 Nathan Latka

So you can't just multiply 20,000 times 2,000 customers to get a $36 million run rate today.

916.613 - 917.534 Prasanna Sankar

That's good.

917.554 - 934.739 Nathan Latka

I see. Okay, cool. I think that's a good, I think that's a good kind of close off to that story. So the lessons there is you started off with again, cheaper, potentially lesser value cohorts, smaller team sizes than now. The average team is 30 people, $20,000 ACVs you're scaling, uh, and go and today you have 2000 paying customers. Yeah.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.