Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing
Podcast Image

StarTalk Radio

Cosmic Queries – Starquakes with Conny Aerts

08 May 2026

Transcription

Chapter 1: What is the main topic discussed in this episode?

0.031 - 23.915 Neil deGrasse Tyson

Hey, Star Talkians, Neil here. You're about to listen to an episode specially drawn from our archives to serve your cosmic curiosities. The archives run deep. If you enjoy this, take a peek at the full catalog on your favorite podcast platform. There's a lot there to tickle your geek underbelly. Check it out.

0
0

24.567 - 48.925 Neil deGrasse Tyson

Welcome to StarTalk, your place in the universe where science and pop culture collide. StarTalk begins right now. This is StarTalk Cosmic Queries Edition. This one is titled Starquakes. I've got as a co-host here Matt Kirshen. Matt, welcome back to StarTalk.

0

48.945 - 51.148 Matt Kirshen

Thank you so much for having me. It's nice to be back.

0

51.432 - 58.887 Neil deGrasse Tyson

Yeah, so you solicited questions about stars and starquakes from... I'm very excited about this topic, and so are the listeners.

58.927 - 68.125 Matt Kirshen

There's been a lot of... A lot of your Patreon patrons have responded to this one, and we're going to try and get through as many of these as possible, but I can't promise all of them. I will try.

68.527 - 70.571 Neil deGrasse Tyson

I don't know a damn thing about starquakes.

71.913 - 82.051 Matt Kirshen

Yeah, I know. I'm excited. I live in California where earthquakes are a problem, so I know how to deal with those. But if you're involved in a starquake, is getting under a table still enough? Or how do we deal with it?

82.292 - 112.061 Neil deGrasse Tyson

Yeah, we're going to find out for sure. So our guest with the expertise we need is Connie Aerts. I think I pronounced that right. Connie, welcome to StarTalk. Hi, glad to be here. Excellent. Now, you're in from Belgium and the Netherlands. You have a dual appointment, one as the professor of astrophysics at, let me get this straight, in... Leuven, Belgium. And it's KU.

Chapter 2: What is a starquake and why is it significant?

228.41 - 230.513 Conny Aerts

And we do the same, but then for stars.

0

230.763 - 238.797 Neil deGrasse Tyson

Okay, Matt, I think Connie just said that while cities are burning and everyone is dying, geologists are delighted that they have earthquakes.

0

238.817 - 246.77 Matt Kirshen

Absolutely, yeah. I'm hiding under a table while my pets are going crazy and seismologists like the data. What beautiful data we're getting right now.

0

246.87 - 270.503 Neil deGrasse Tyson

The data. But I'm confused, though, because when I think of an earthquake, I have a very simple idea. understanding of it, that you have a rigid crust that is under pressure and under tension, and then it spontaneously gives way. And then you get an abrupt shift, and that's an earthquake. But when I think of stars, they're fluids. They're gaseous fluids.

0

271.023 - 279.754 Neil deGrasse Tyson

So what could possibly be quaking if you don't have anything solid to build up the tension that then gets released?

280.19 - 312.658 Conny Aerts

Yeah, so that's a bit different because the starquakes are happening all the time because it's a gas. And so you have motions, right? Up and down motions, but also more complex motions. And if you press a gas and then release it, it creates sound waves. That's a bit like music in a theater hall. So for me, stars are three-dimensional musical objects. holes, concert holes, right?

312.678 - 312.758 Unknown

Wow.

312.958 - 321.847 Conny Aerts

And so the nice thing is that starquakes are always there. Luckily for us humans, the earthquakes die out quickly, right?

322.507 - 334.019 Neil deGrasse Tyson

And they're rare, relatively. I mean, they're rare in the sense of the ones that do serious damage are rare. But as I understand it, there are actually earthquakes of even very small magnitude almost all the time. I think that's correct.

Chapter 3: How does astroseismology help us understand stars?

575.843 - 580.872 Neil deGrasse Tyson

I don't know what that is. Maybe that's California after it breaks away from the San Andreas Fault.

0

580.852 - 601.746 Matt Kirshen

just floating off just floating off into the pacific so why don't we get some more questions here this is great now that we have some foundation for yeah we've got some awesome ones some of them have already something we've already kind of answered and i'm sure that'll happen as we go along but i'll try and get as many ones in so james smith from indianapolis says what is the largest recorded quake not found here on earth

0

601.726 - 607.299 Matt Kirshen

And also, do all planets have plates that shift like Earth? A couple of people have asked that question as well, whether all other planets have plates. Interesting.

0

607.319 - 619.347 Neil deGrasse Tyson

So let's start there first. You know, we know Earth is geologically active because there's like volcanoes and plate tectonics. So where else in the solar system might do that before we get back to the sun?

0

619.327 - 639.991 Conny Aerts

Oh, well, you know, all planets will have quakes. I mean, any body in nature quakes. I was banging, I was about to bang the table here, but I will not do that. But the table would also have, you know, quakes. So they then pile quickly, depending on whether you have a gaseous planet or a crust-like planet like Earth.

640.492 - 647.46 Conny Aerts

So Jupiter, Saturn, all the big gaseous planets in our solar system, they also have quakes.

647.44 - 653.829 Neil deGrasse Tyson

Wait a minute, Connie, you're saying every sound anywhere is a quake to you. Yeah. Okay.

654.653 - 655.135 Conny Aerts

That's true.

655.336 - 656.421

You do.

Chapter 4: What are the differences between starquakes and earthquakes?

1042.269 - 1048.715 Matt Kirshen

Well, you can find my podcast, Probably Science. I start with the Neil episode. That's always a nice place to start.

0

1049.095 - 1058.343 Neil deGrasse Tyson

I was a guest once on your Probably Science. I just thought by now it would have been called Certainly Science. I thought it was evolutionary, but apparently not.

0

1058.564 - 1060.645 Matt Kirshen

The longer we do the show, the more probably it gets.

0
0

1062.346 - 1073.744 Matt Kirshen

It's going to descend through possibly to... To probably not. And then I'm on Twitter, at Matt Kirshen, and technically on Instagram, but I'm very rarely there.

1073.764 - 1103 Neil deGrasse Tyson

Okay, Kirshen, K-I-R-S-H-E-N. And we have as our in-house expert right now on Starquakes, professor of astro-seismology in the Netherlands. But right now, Connie... I think I pronounced that right, is visiting New York City at a place called the Flatiron Institute, which is in the Flatiron section of Manhattan. And very cool science is happening there. All manner of science.

1103.101 - 1133.157 Neil deGrasse Tyson

It started with sort of math and astrophysics, but it's spilling into biology and computer science where... very deep problems that need high performance computing and clever people to solve them are invited to then gather their talents and try to solve the secrets of the universe. And Connie Arts is on sabbatical this year. So Connie, we're delighted to have you as part of this podcast.

1133.98 - 1135.303 Conny Aerts

Very grateful to be here.

1135.363 - 1162.211 Neil deGrasse Tyson

Thank you. Yeah, yeah. So we've got some more questions. But before we do that, I just want to be clear that most people's understanding of the word quake is... I think built in is that it's abrupt and short-lived. That's kind of built into our life experience with a quake. But we're now hearing about quakes on completely different time scales.

Chapter 5: How do scientists measure the oscillations of stars?

1436.64 - 1438.083 Conny Aerts

What a smack.

0

1438.103 - 1442.954 Neil deGrasse Tyson

Matt, did you hear? Matt, did I just hear this woman correctly here?

0

1443.635 - 1447.183 Matt Kirshen

Yeah, I stand by it. I'm on team star on this one.

0

1448.007 - 1450.63 Neil deGrasse Tyson

That was a smackdown right there.

0

1450.651 - 1477.146 Conny Aerts

Yes, I always say the stars are right, the theory is wrong if it doesn't match with each other, right? So thanks to the frequency shifts of these waves, we can now measure how stars rotate around. And why is that important? Well, if they rotate faster or slower, then their material gets mixed in a different way. That's also something you can imagine if you take the analogy with coffee drinkers.

1477.567 - 1499.244 Conny Aerts

If you like coffee with milk, you pour milk into your coffee and you don't wait until everything is mixed because then the coffee is cold and it doesn't taste well anymore. No, you take a spoon and you rotate your coffee. In my terminology, that is saying you bring angular momentum to the coffee cup. And why do you do that?

1499.264 - 1501.989 Neil deGrasse Tyson

That's what everyone says when they're having coffee at Starbucks.

1502.009 - 1510.062 Conny Aerts

That's what everybody does without saying it. And that's because everybody prefers well-mixed coffee with milk.

1510.543 - 1515.832 Matt Kirshen

I'm assuming at the Flatiron Institute that just the coffee station there has angular momentum implements.

Chapter 6: What insights can we gain from studying starquakes?

1668.207 - 1678.721 Conny Aerts

And so if you change that 10% to, say, 12%, that sounds like, you know, it's only 2%, you know, but that's a lot of fuel. that you bring into your nuclear reactor.

0

1678.801 - 1682.245 Neil deGrasse Tyson

And so then... And increase the life by at least 20%, perhaps.

0

1682.866 - 1692.378 Conny Aerts

Yeah, yeah, yeah. It can really change the lifetime of the star. So that's... And Matt, if you were in the center of a star, you'd be dense too.

0

1692.599 - 1694.001 Neil deGrasse Tyson

I just wanted to tell you that.

0

1694.021 - 1718.365 Matt Kirshen

Oh, thanks. It's one of the nicest things anyone's ever said to me. So we've got more questions, Matt. We do. Aziz from Saudi Arabia says, I wonder if it's possible for a star to have a starquake so strong caused by, for example, nuclear fission or fusion happening or abnormally fast or caused by any other reason to lose mass. I thought I'd ask that one because we're already talking about fusion.

1718.345 - 1739.411 Neil deGrasse Tyson

You know, in the formation of stars in the galaxy, you can get shockwaves across a gas cloud that's otherwise mining its own business, and it can trigger gravitational collapse and other interesting features. So, I'd love that question, Connie. So, are starquakes just the product of what's going on, or are they a participant in causing what's going on.

1739.431 - 1769.198 Conny Aerts

Yeah, so you can have all sorts of reasons why stars have these oscillations, right? And they can indeed be caused by the fierce turbulence in the core of a very massive star because it's, you know, we call that convection, turbulent motions, and they create waves also because, again, they make the gas, you know, compress and expand. But there are also other reasons why stars can have starquakes.

1769.499 - 1780.449 Conny Aerts

Think of the Earth-Moon system and tides. Well, half of the stars, or even more if you go to higher masses, they live together with two. And then they have tidal forces.

1780.469 - 1794 Neil deGrasse Tyson

Binary star system. Binary star system, yeah. Just like in that scene in Star Wars where Luke comes out, is it the sand planet? And he sees a double sunset. That's the only accurate science in the entire series.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.