Capacity Issues in Family Litigation: The Lights Are Not Out!

episode

Talking Family Law - The Resolution Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from Talking Family Law - The Resolution Podcast

How to run a case in a Child Focused Court 38 min · 27 Jul 2026

Enforcement of financial remedy orders 57 min · 29 Jun 2026

LIVE from National Conference: AI and the Risk of Bias 43 min · 29 May 2026

All episodes from Talking Family Law - The Resolution Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded10 Apr 2025

Publisherfeeds.transistor.fm ↗

Handlerec:1644568

Show notes

We are joined by Joseph O’Brien of St Johns Buildings and Laura Flanagan of Burgess Mee to discuss how to manage cases that involve capacity issues. Laura has recently co-authored an article with Maisie Lockyer on this issue:https://financialremediesjournal.com/content/family-proceedings-and-litigation-capacity.ec7c993244094031bbcb75338ef9c29e.htmUnfortunately, court commitments meant Maisie was unable to join us for the recording.Joe tells us that the Mental Capacity Act 2005 is the basis on which all capacity assessments should be undertaken. He reminds us that there is a presumption of capacity, but the presumption of capacity can be rebutted. The test is set out in s.2(1): 2. People who lack capacity(1) For the purposes of this Act, a person lacks capacity in relation to a matter if at the material time he is unable to make a decision for himself in relation to the matter because of an impairment of, or a disturbance in the functioning of, the mind or brain.Laura directs us to the Official Solicitor’s website, which includes guidance notes and the pro forma for the Certificate as to Capacity: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63e3b03ad3bf7f172ccae151/capacity-to-conduct-proceedings-certificate.pdfJoe reminds us that capacity involves a two-stage test: the first stage considers whether the person is unable to make the decision, and the second examines whether that inability is caused by an impairment of the mind or brain, as per A Local Authority v JB (Rev1) [2021] UKSC 52 https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2021/52.html We also discuss what should happen when the protected parties have fluctuating capacity. Laura and Joe remind us that you need to make an application to terminate the appointment of the litigation friend if your client regains capacity, but you must apply for the litigation friend to be reappointed if they lose capacity again. Finally, we discuss how the Court makes the decision about whether the protected person should give evidence. Joe reminds us of the practice direction on participation of vulnerable witnesses https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/family/practice_directions/practice-direction-3aa-vulnerable-persons-participation-in-proceedings-and-giving-evidence#1

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.