Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing
Podcast Image

The AI Daily Brief: Artificial Intelligence News and Analysis

Claude Cowork Is Claude Code for Everyone Else

13 Jan 2026

Transcription

Chapter 1: What is Claude Cowork and why is it significant?

0.031 - 18.259 Unknown

Today on the AI Daily Brief, Anthropic's new co-work tool is clawed code for everybody else. And today we're talking about why it's potentially a very big deal. The AI Daily Brief is a daily podcast and video about the most important news and discussions in AI.

0

19.387 - 38.467 Nathaniel Whittemore

All right, friends, quick announcements before we dive in. Firstly, and of course, thank you to today's sponsors, Optimize Lee Zen Coder, Assembly, and Super Intelligent. If you are one of those folks who would love to pay for the privilege of not hearing the ads and has an extra three bucks a month to spend, you can find the ad-free version at patreon.com.ai daily brief.

0

38.947 - 54.81 Nathaniel Whittemore

Or if you're an Apple listener, you can subscribe directly from the Apple podcast app to learn about sponsoring the show. Send us a note at sponsors at ai daily brief.ai. And speaking of AIDailyBrief.ai, one more quick thing. While you're there, press the number five or navigate to AIDailyBrief.ai slash Compass.

0

55.151 - 67.855 Nathaniel Whittemore

If you are interested in the new Strategy Compass product we are launching from Super Intelligent, it's basically our agent readiness assessments plus an information subscription all bundled into a self-serve package. And we are going to start onboarding people over the next couple of weeks.

0

67.835 - 78.672 Nathaniel Whittemore

Now, last note before we dive in, this is one of those meaty main episodes that really deserves its own show. And so that's what we've done. We will be back with our normal format tomorrow. But for now, let's dig in and talk about Claude Cowork.

79.478 - 96.382 Nathaniel Whittemore

One of the universally recognized truths among people in the AI industry is that the single worst named product is not somehow ChatGPT or GPT-52-Pro-QXYZ or the totally out of left field Nanobanana Pro, but is in fact Claude Code.

96.823 - 116.151 Nathaniel Whittemore

And the reason that Claude Code is such a bad name in some ways is that the code part of Claude Code, in fact, distracts from the full possibilities that the tool actually represents. Now, all it takes is a quick look at any especially non-technical person who has really dug into cloud code to see why it's so much more powerful than it seems just from that name alone.

116.3 - 132.245 Nathaniel Whittemore

Just a couple of days ago on Sunday, Nikhil Krishnan wrote, I've spent the last 48 hours in clawed code. As a non-technical person, it's basically unlocked three very big things for me. One, the ability to interact with APIs generally. Again, as a non-technical person, one of the big barriers to running the business has been touching APIs.

132.565 - 149.81 Nathaniel Whittemore

For example, what you can do in Stripe in the non-developer portal versus through the APIs is night and day. Two, the ability to thread things together. Another issue has been threading several different projects we work with together to do cohesive tasks. Zapier gets you part of the way for triggers, but Cloud Code lets me do way more complex things that touches multiple things simultaneously.

Chapter 2: How does Claude Cowork enhance productivity for non-technical users?

401.823 - 421.168 Nathaniel Whittemore

It feels much less like a back and forth and more like leaving messages for a coworker. So let's talk about how people reacted to it and what they started to do with it. I will say first that there were a lot of, especially developers and technical folks, that were, to use a word, underwhelmed. Claude Cowork didn't really add anything new. But they were, of course, not the actual target.

0

421.529 - 436.996 Nathaniel Whittemore

Olivia Moore for A16Z gets it when she writes, watershed moment for Claude and Anthropic. Claude has always been a fantastic product with arguably the best agentic models, but has struggled to make these advantages usable for the mainstream consumer. This feels like the first concentrated effort to change that.

0

437.356 - 448.757 Nathaniel Whittemore

Greg Eisenberg says, Send this to every normal person you know because normal people don't want to touch a terminal and this will make them 100x more powerful and productive at whatever it is they do. Indeed, speaking to how much more inviting this user interface is...

0

448.737 - 465.79 Nathaniel Whittemore

Avthar shared a screenshot of the new Claude cowork on his desktop saying, let's knock something off your list with a highly action oriented UI that suggests creating a file, crunching data, organizing files, making a prototype, prepping for the day or sending a message. He wrote even as a Claude code diehard, I'm excited to play around with it more. So what have people been doing?

0

466.25 - 481.773 Nathaniel Whittemore

Well, Kat Wu, who works on Cloud Coded Anthropic, wrote, I've been delegating a lot of my tasks to CoWork. Today, CoWork filed a workplace ticket for a coffee spill, prepped me for upcoming meetings, looked up Salesforce data via Chrome tool, and helped me buy a new down jacket. Lenny Rychitsky has been trying out a number of different use cases.

482.254 - 499.119 Nathaniel Whittemore

In one, he said, I asked it to go through every Lenny's podcast episode and pull out the 10 most important themes and lessons for product builders, then the 10 most counterintuitive truths. I gave it access to a folder with 320 transcripts. First, it said, this is a substantial task, 320 podcast transcripts to analyze. 15 minutes later, he had his list.

499.66 - 518.687 Nathaniel Whittemore

So I think it's worth pausing and double-clicking on this. This is, of course, a type of use case that lots of people use existing tools for. In other words, taking the context of one set of content and turning it into other content. The difference here is, of course, the scale. Lenny's episodes are dense. They're long. 320 transcripts is going to be between 450 and 600 hours of content.

518.667 - 530.142 Nathaniel Whittemore

if not more, which is not something that would have been easily possible with other types of tools. In many ways, a lot of the core and differentiating use cases can be summed up as stuff that needs access to local files on your computer.

530.582 - 548.73 Nathaniel Whittemore

As OffMenu's Hunter Hammonds wrote, irony is every productivity app pouring billions into mediocre AI implementations just for local first files to become the chosen one. So what else worked well? Joseph on X writes, co-work is magical. Seeing the context and the artifacts on the right side feels unreal. I got a flight canceled for no reason and Claude is filling out all my claims.

Chapter 3: What are the main features of Claude Cowork?

1611.794 - 1630.767 Nathaniel Whittemore

Now, even though There are still some holdouts right now, many holdouts in fact, who still try to draw a thick line between vibe coding things that you can use for not production and prototypes and non-vibe coded things that are ready for production. I am firmly in the camp that that line is basically already gone and if not, is going to explode in the next several months.

0

1630.747 - 1648.112 Nathaniel Whittemore

Didi Das of Menlo Ventures seems to agree. After Boris shared that all of this had been written by Claude Code, Didi writes, Today was proof that fully polished new product can be built entirely with vibe coding tools like Claude Code. Many people, especially in big tech, who still don't believe it. You haven't tried the latest models. You don't have the right setup.

0

1648.312 - 1666.178 Nathaniel Whittemore

Your code base is still too large. Your code style is not well represented in the training data. All four of these are entirely self-imposed problems. you will be outrun on product velocity if you aren't adopting these tools. This is something that I'm going to explore in much more depth in and around this show throughout this year, so keep your eyes peeled for that.

0

1666.719 - 1679.738 Nathaniel Whittemore

And in the meantime, if you do happen to have a Max account, go check out Claude Cowork. Once you do, if you have ideas for how to make it work, share them with the team. One thing Anthropic is doing really well right now, and in fact, I think you have to give credit to all the major labs for,

0

1679.718 - 1696.996 Nathaniel Whittemore

is they are all floating all around X all the time, actively engaging with and listening to the suggestions of users. Felix Riesberg of Anthropic even requests to be tagged in that feedback, saying, we want to iterate very quickly and make it a little bit better every day. Ultimately, for all of its faults and challenges, I think this is a huge step forward.

1697.457 - 1712.502 Nathaniel Whittemore

Goodness knows if you're listening to this show, you probably have felt like people have been beating you over the head with how good Cloud Code is for months now. And with co-work, there is increasingly going to be a UI for everybody who's not a developer to try to get all those benefits. I will certainly continue to be trying it out and sharing it as I figure use cases out.

1712.984 - 1718.989 Nathaniel Whittemore

For now, though, that's going to do it for today's AI Daily Brief. Appreciate you listening as always. And until next time, peace.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.