Episode 150: Bridging Reform and Revolution for Systemic Change

episode

The AutSide Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from The AutSide Podcast

Episode 452: Pressing Pause—Ethics of Estrangement and Non-Ownership 11 min · 20 Dec 2025

All episodes from The AutSide Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded21 Feb 2025

Publisherapi.substack.com ↗

Handlerec:2937024

Show notes

“Today’s episode examines the divide between reformist and revolutionary approaches within neurodiversity advocacy, particularly regarding the experiences of BIPOC individuals. It highlights how white, reformist advocacy often focuses on incremental changes that do not address systemic oppression. Revolutionary advocacy, on the other hand, seeks to dismantle oppressive systems like capitalism and colonialism, which disproportionately harm marginalized communities. The author of the source article, Dr. Jaime Hoerricks, argues that "enshittification", or the degradation of systems for profit, worsens these inequities and reinforces divides within advocacy. They call on white advocates to use their privilege to support BIPOC-led revolutionary movements. Ultimately, Dr. Hoerricks envisions a future based on matristic principles of equity and collective well-being.”Here’s the link to the source article: https://open.substack.com/pub/autside/p/reform-or-revolution-bridging-theLet me know what you think.The AutSide is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, consider becoming a paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit autside.substack.com/subscribe

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.