Episode 241: Expert Reports - A Pattern of Institutional Containment

episode

The AutSide Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from The AutSide Podcast

Episode 452: Pressing Pause—Ethics of Estrangement and Non-Ownership 11 min · 20 Dec 2025

All episodes from The AutSide Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded23 May 2025

Publisherapi.substack.com ↗

Handlerec:2936933

Show notes

“Today’s episode argues that the Cass Review, despite presenting itself as an independent analysis of gender identity services, is actually an example of a recurring pattern where institutions utilise expert-led reports to manage public anxieties and reinforce existing power structures. The author of the source article, Dr. Jaime Hoerricks, contends that such reviews often minimise lived experience and strategically select individuals who are detached from the affected communities, ultimately serving to contain dissent and stabilise preferred narratives rather than facilitate genuine reform. This pattern is illustrated with examples from various fields, including forensic science and education policy, to demonstrate how ostensibly neutral inquiries can be used to legitimise biased outcomes and sideline alternative perspectives, particularly those from marginalised groups.”Here’s the link to the source article: https://open.substack.com/pub/autside/p/not-the-first-not-the-last-how-institutionsLet me know what you think.The AutSide is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, consider becoming a paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit autside.substack.com/subscribe

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.