Episode 428: From Malleus to Algorithm—Standardising Systemic Violence

episode

The AutSide Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from The AutSide Podcast

Episode 452: Pressing Pause—Ethics of Estrangement and Non-Ownership 11 min · 20 Dec 2025

All episodes from The AutSide Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded26 Nov 2025

Publisherapi.substack.com ↗

Handlerec:12118867

Show notes

Today’s episode explores the historical and technological continuity of systematic harm. The author of the source article, Dr. Jaime Hoerricks, argues that texts like the Malleus Maleficarum (Witch’s Hammer), an early instrument of standardised persecution made widely accessible by the printing press, established an architecture of violence that has persisted through the ages. This architecture of defining and eliminating deviation moved from theological justifications in witch hunts to medical and psychiatric diagnoses used against queer and neurodivergent individuals, and now manifests in modern algorithms and Large Language Models (LLMs). The core claim is that new technologies, like AI, merely automate and scale old prejudices by ingesting and reproducing archives shaped by historical biases, transforming old hierarchies into new, hard-to-contest forms of procedural violence, such as risk-scoring and predictive policing. Ultimately, Dr. Hoerricks calls for recognition and disruption of this recurring pattern of standardised harm before it becomes inevitable within the algorithmic state.Here’s the link to the source article: https://open.substack.com/pub/autside/p/from-the-malleus-maleficarum-to-algorithmicLet me know what you think.The AutSide is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, consider becoming a paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit autside.substack.com/subscribe

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.