The standards the MTB industry should use

episode

The BikeRadar Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

A.I. Safety Goes Mainstream + a ‘Hard Fork’ Exit AMA 1h 25m · 18 Sep 2026 · Hard Fork

AWP: Beyond the Exam Room: Purpose, Myopia, and Population Health 54 min · 17 Sep 2026 · EyeCode Media

Essentials: How to Assess & Improve All Aspects of Your Fitness | Dr. Andy Galpin 35 min · 17 Sep 2026 · Huberman Lab

#502 – Psychiatry, Insane Asylums, Mental Illness, ECT, Lobotomies, Freud & Jung 3h 43m · 17 Sep 2026 · Lex Fridman Podcast

September 16, 2026 PC - Sep 16, 2026 1h 50m · 16 Sep 2026 · Fairfax County Planning Commission

Planning Commision 09/16/2026 - Sep 16, 2026 56 min · 16 Sep 2026 · Prince William County Planning Commission

Report any issue

Source

Recorded01 Feb 2021

Publisherfeeds.megaphone.fm ↗

Handlerec:7399771

Show notes

Following an utterly frustrating experience trying to fix a couple of bits on his bike, Tom got so annoyed with the lack of standardisation in compatibility of bike parts he compiled a list of the standards the mountain bike industry should just use. Did his colleagues Rob and Seb agree? The article Tom wrote can be found here – let us know what you think! https://www.bikeradar.com/features/opinion/bike-industry-mtb-standards/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in