
The Chuck ToddCast
Interview only w/ Frank Lavin - Is There Any “Reagan” Left In Trump’s Republican Party?
15 Sep 2025
On this episode of the Chuck ToddCast, former U.S. Ambassador and Reagan White House veteran Frank Lavin joins to reflect on the state of American politics and what lessons might be drawn from Ronald Reagan’s presidency. From Reagan’s approach to bipartisanship and his handling of foreign policy, to Trump’s transactional style and fixation on deference, Lavin weighs in on how today’s leaders measure up against the conservative legacy of the past. He explores what governing responsibly looks like in a narrowly divided nation and why Reagan’s emphasis on free trade and coalition-building still matters.The conversation stretches from historical “what ifs”—like whether Reagan would have risen without Ford’s pardon of Nixon—to the present-day challenges of Ukraine, China, and the role of U.S. alliances in Asia. Lavin also tackles questions of Trump’s political lineage, whether there’s an heir to Trumpism, and how both parties are struggling with trade, borders, and identity. With insights from inside the Reagan administration and a sharp eye on today’s divisions, Lavin offers a wide-angle view on conservatism, leadership, and what the future of American politics might hold.Got injured in an accident? You could be one click away from a claim worth millions. Just visit https://www.forthepeople.com/TODDCAST to start your claim now with Morgan & Morgan without leaving your couch. Remember, it's free unless you win! Timeline:(Timestamps may vary based on advertisements)00:00 Frank Lavin joins the Chuck ToddCast03:15 Where are we as a country and how would Reagan have handled it?04:30 Social media rewards audacity and “nutpicking”05:45 We haven’t hit bottom yet08:45 What would Reagan have done with full control of congress?10:00 What is the responsibility of a 51-49 winner to the 49?11:00 The problem with only governing for your base12:15 Leaders should actively pursue their agenda despite opposition13:30 Clinton and Reagan had to accommodate the other side14:15 People like the idea of Trump more than him actually being president15:30 If Ford doesn’t pardon Nixon, does Reagan win the primary?18:30 Is a political/DC outsider best positioned to win in 2028?20:15 Reagan would be pushing back on Putin in Ukraine21:15 Our weakness on Ukraine will motivate China on Taiwan22:00 Obama’s lack of action on Crimea green lit Putin on Ukraine23:00 How do our Asian allies change their behavior without US security?24:00 Asian countries will have to accommodate China 25:00 Hosting US military base didn’t prevent strike on Qatar26:45 Is Trump an heir to the Reagan lineage?27:45 Reagan was for free trade, Trump is not29:00 Trump’s premise that free trade hurts us is faulty30:15 How often did you get time with Reagan as a staffer?32:30 Reagan was dedicated to getting George Bush elected34:30 Trump isn’t foreign policy oriented, he’s transactional35:30 Trump has a 19th century style of foreign policy37:45 Trump cares more about deference than achieving policy goals38:30 Is Trump’s Republican party similar to the 1920’s GOP?40:15 Democrats have been mixed messengers on free trade41:00 Sherrod Brown is an “old” politician, been in politics forever42:15 Should Democrats embrace Trump’s border policy43:30 Obama likely benefitted from the “deporter in-chief” protests45:45 What is the definition of traditional conservatism?46:45 What could Romney/Ryan done better to prevent Trumpism?47:45 Nobody permanently shifts US politics49:00 Trump won on culture and by not going after entitlements50:45 Cutting postal service is a place to cut spending51:45 There’s little political reward for incrementalism52:15 Trump isn’t a conservative, but rejects the left54:00 Trump’s anti-crime policies are deliberately offensive55:00 George H.W. Bush didn’t have communications skills like Reagan56:00 Is there an heir to Trump?59:00 The joy of teaching at USC Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
No persons identified in this episode.
No transcription available yet
Help us prioritize this episode for transcription by upvoting it.
Popular episodes get transcribed faster