Ep 256 - Conflict Case Study: David Walliams vs HarperCollins

episode

The HR Room Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

recent transcribed audio

Nightcap Hour 1: Broncos WALK DOWN Rams + Ravens BEAT Cowboys in Brazil + Steelers STUN Bengals 57 min · 28 Sep 2026 · Nightcap

Day 271: Love of God (2026) 20 min · 28 Sep 2026 · The Catechism in a Year (with Fr. Mike Schmitz)

Day 271: The Sorrowful Mysteries 14 min · 28 Sep 2026 · The Rosary in a Year (with Fr. Mark-Mary Ames)

Nightcap Hour 2: Deshaun Watson WINS AGAIN + Justin Herbert PLAYING Like GARBAGE +Jaguars MAN HANDLE Patriots + Lions OUTLAST Jets + Colts SEND Texans PACKING + Commanders SHOCK Seahawks + Vikings CRUISE to WIN Over Bucs 1h 6m · 28 Sep 2026 · Club Shay Shay

Seventh Generation: Alan Newman and Jeffrey Hollender. A Partnership that Flourished—until it Failed. (2021) 1h 31m · 28 Sep 2026 · How I Built This with Guy Raz

Report any issue

Source

Recorded03 Feb 2026

Publisherfeed.podbean.com ↗

Handlerec:15666924

Show notes

Workplace investigations sit at the heart of fairness, trust and accountability in organisations. But when investigations involve high-profile individuals, external parties, or allegations of serious misconduct, the scrutiny can be intense and the risks for employers multiply rapidly if fair procedures are not followed. In this episode of The HR Room Podcast, Dave and Mary are joined by Rebecca Bowman, Head of Investigations at Insight HR, to examine a recent high-profile UK case involving HarperCollins and allegations made against author David Walliams. Using what has been publicly reported about the case, they whether the investigation process itself may have been flawed and what HR leaders can learn when managing allegations involving contractors, public figures and non-employees. They unpack the principles of natural justice, the importance of fair procedures, and why speed, secrecy or outcome-driven approaches can expose organisations to legal challenge, reputational damage and loss of trust. The discussion offers practical guidance for HR professionals navigating complex investigations under intense pressure. Guest Rebecca Bowman – Head of Investigations, Insight HR Topics include: Why workplace investigations must be handled with care — especially in high-profile cases The HarperCollins / David Walliams case and what has been publicly reported Investigating allegations involving contractors, consultants and external parties Employers’ duty of care when employees interact with non-employees What “natural justice” and fair procedures mean in practice Why the right to respond is fundamental to any defensible investigation The risks of outcome-driven or rushed investigations Reputational damage caused by flawed investigation processes Protecting employee wellbeing while ensuring procedural fairness When to involve external investigators in complex or sensitive cases Key non-negotiables for a fair, impartial and robust investigation Useful Links & Resources Media coverage of the HarperCollins / David Walliams investigation Workplace Investigation Services - Insight HR Workplace Investigations Guide - Insight HR Get in touch If you’re not already following us on LinkedIn, you can do that here. If you have suggestions for future episodes, or if you’d like to join us as a guest, reach out to Dave at [email protected] or connect with him on LinkedIn. For confidential HR support, contact [email protected] 📞 Immediate HR support: 056 770 1060 We love your feedback and we’re always here to support you with your HR challenges. About The HR Room Podcast The HR Room Podcast is brought to you by The HR Room Podcast, produced by Insight HR — where we speak with HR leaders, experts and practitioners across Ireland and beyond about the issues shaping the world of work today. If you’re enjoying the podcast, please share it with colleagues or friends and leave us a review.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related