Ep. 257: Locke Against Innate Ideas (Part One)

episode

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Ep. 401: Mind/Brain Identity Theory (U.T. Place, J.J.C. Smart) (Part One) 49 min · 28 Sep 2026

PREMIUM-Ep. 400: Dennett Rejects Qualia (Part Three) 10 min · 26 Sep 2026

PEL Presents Philosophy vs. Theater w/ David Epstein 1h 1m · 25 Sep 2026

Ep. 400: Dennett Rejects Qualia (Part Two) 51 min · 21 Sep 2026

PEL Presents Closereads: Late Dennett on Consciousness (Part One) 55 min · 20 Sep 2026

PEL Presents PMP#230: Gettin' Furious 49 min · 18 Sep 2026

All episodes from The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded23 Nov 2020

Publisherpartiallyexaminedlife.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:5514585

Show notes

On Book I of John Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689). How do we know things? Locke thought all knowledge comes from experience, and this might seem uncontroversial, but what are the alternatives? We consider the idea that there are some ideas we're just born with and don't need to learn. But what's an "idea," and how is it different from a principle? Clearly we have instincts ("knowhow") but is that knowledge? We consider occurrent vs. dispositional nativism, the role of reason, and what Locke's overall project is after. Don't wait for Part Two; get the full, ad-free Citizen Edition now. Please support PEL!

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in