Ep. 280: Imre Lakatos on Scientific Progress (Part One)

episode

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Ep. 401: Mind/Brain Identity Theory (U.T. Place, J.J.C. Smart) (Part One) 49 min · 28 Sep 2026

PREMIUM-Ep. 400: Dennett Rejects Qualia (Part Three) 10 min · 26 Sep 2026

PEL Presents Philosophy vs. Theater w/ David Epstein 1h 1m · 25 Sep 2026

Ep. 400: Dennett Rejects Qualia (Part Two) 51 min · 21 Sep 2026

PEL Presents Closereads: Late Dennett on Consciousness (Part One) 55 min · 20 Sep 2026

PEL Presents PMP#230: Gettin' Furious 49 min · 18 Sep 2026

All episodes from The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded25 Oct 2021

Publisherpartiallyexaminedlife.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:5514536

Show notes

On "Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes" (1970). In what way is scientific progress rational? Lakatos splits the difference between Popper and Kuhn to argue that some scientific research programs are more progressive than others, meaning that they make dramatic, unexpected predictions. Part two of this episode is only going to be available to you if you sign up at partiallyexaminedlife.com/support or via Apple Podcasts. Get it now or listen to a preview.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in