* Today we got the Non-Farm Payroll report for the month of June * Remember the last 2 reports were quite weak and everybody was hoping for a rebound in June to prove that April and May were a fluke and not a new trend * In fact the Fed talked about that in their last FOMC meeting minutes * The consensus was for 180,000 jobs to be created and the range went from a low of 130,000 to as high as 235,000 * The consensus average of that range was 180,000 * The actual number came in at 287,000, over 100,000 jobs above the consensus * Now we did revise down the really bad number from May, and made it even worse * Initially that number was 38,000 jobs and now we know it was just 11,000 jobs * So about 70% of the jobs disappeared * I have a good feeling that the reason June's number is so high is that it's just wrong, and we'll see what kind of revision we get to it next month * Remember, a good chunk of these numbers are jobs that the government assumes were created without evidence, based on the birth-death model * I would suggest that far fewer businesses are actually being formed than the government believes * In fact, its possible that more business are shutting down than are hiring * Given the economy and the minimum wage, those business that are starting up are hiring fewer people than start-up historically hire * I think these guesstimates are wildly optimistic and skewing all the numbers * Unemployment rate, which was 4.7 last month and expected to notch up to 4.8, instead notched up higher to 4.9 * Private payrolls which were expected to rise by $170,000 jumped by $265,000 * But last month they revised a $25,000 gain to a $6,000 loss * Why did unemployment move up? Because the labor force participation rate notched up from 62.6 to 62.7 * Obviously not all the people who re-joined the labor force could find jobs * Average hourly earnings were expected to rise by .2% * Again they disappointed; they rose by just .1% * Overall, a mixed picture, but the headline number, the 287,000 vs 180,000 consensus * That's normally the number the market trades off * And that is exactly what happened - as soon as the report came out we had a big jump in the dollar index and we had a big selloff in Gold * Gold started out largely unchanged, went down about $22 on the news * Silver sold off, it was down about 40-50 cents * That was the knee-jerk reaction: strong dollar, weak gold, weak silver * Why? * A strong jobs number means the Fed is more likely to raise rates, right? * Rate hike is coming, good for the dollar, bad for gold * But what did I say on Wednesday's podcast? * I said that it didn't matter what the jobs number was * That gold was not going to go down, and if it was a weak number, I expected a big rally in gold * But I also said that a strong number would not hurt gold * Earlier in the year, a strong number would crush gold * I said that what's going on, and based on the latest FOMC minutes, I don't care what the jobs number is * The Fed is not going to raise rates * Jobs have nothing to do with it, Jobs are the excuse * The Fed can't raise rates now because of the fragility in the banking system, all the things that were revealed by Brexit * The market is sensing that and that's why within the first hour gold reversed all of its losses and finished the day up about $5.60 at $1365.40 * The highest close of the year on a day when we had a huge beat in the Non-Farm Payrolls * Silver had an even more impressive reversal; it rallied over $1 * Stocks really broke out; the GDX was up over 30% today to close at $30.54 * Not quite the highest close of the year Our Sponsors:* Check out Infinite Epigenetics: https://infiniteepigenetics.com/GOLD* Check out Justin Wine and use my code SCHIFF20 for a great deal: https://www.justinwine.comPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related