* Today Janet Yellen goes back up the Hill for the second of her 2-day Congressional testimony and the press has already made headlines about what she did not say * According to the headlines, Yellen's "hawkish" testimony reflected that she is putting the Fed on a path to hike rates later later this year * That is not what she said * From her prepared, written testimony, which was carefully crafted for all eyes, this is what she said: * "If the economy evolves as we expect, economic conditions likely will make it appropriate at some time this year to raise the Federal Funds rate target, thereby beginning to normalize the stance on monetary policy." * This sentence starts with a big condition: "If the economy evolves as we expect" * When has the economy ever evolved as the Fed expected? - Probably never * Even if the economy improves, those improvements may not live up to the Fed's unspecified expectations * "Economic conditions might make it appropriate to raise rates- * Not result in raising rates, of require us to raise rates - just because it is appropriate to raise rates doesn't mean the Fed will raise them * If the Fed was going to do what was appropriate, they would have raised rates a long time ago * Zero percent interest rates was never appropriate * Yellen herself has said she was likely to leave interest rates lower than would be appropriate because of "special circumstances" * Even if it is appropriate, there is no commitment to raise rates at any point this year * If Janet Yellen really said what the headlines infer, she would have said: * "Given the strength in the economy we will be raising interest rates later this year * She said nothing like that * The Fed went way out of its way to commit to nothing * Yet that's not the way the media is covering this * Why is that? Everyone wants to pretend that the economy is good and that the Fed is going to normalize interest rates * All of this make-believe causes the dollar to rally and gold to go down * By talking about raising interest rates, the Fed is pretending that the U.S. economy is strong enough to withstand higher interest rates without actually inflicting the pain of higher interest rates on all those addicted to the bubble economy * Yellen's responses to to questions during the Q&A were equally dovish * At one point in particular Yellen admitted that we've had zero percent interest rates for a long time and will proceed slowly in any attempt to raise rates * If we notice higher rates are causing pain, we will slow down * What is hawkish about that? * When Paul Volker raised rates to 20% of course he knew it would hurt the economy in the short term, but he knew it was needed * Yellen is worried that if the patient makes a bad face, she will discontinue the "medicine" * It is impossible to raise rates without hurting the economy, especially because a large part of our economy is now dependent on zero interest rates * Higher interest rates will expose a lot of unsound business decisions * It's not the economy that will be hurt, but the bubble - zero percent interest rates are the fuel for the bubble * Zero percent interest rates are more essential now than they were six years ago * Now we have much more debt to service * An interest rates hike would quickly wipe out any minimal gain from a stronger economy * The reality is the economy is already weakening * 70% of our GDP is consumption fueled by debt * Yellen said that zero percent interest rates may be a problem in the long run * It's the long run now * The deficit is already unsustainable * One of the most interesting rates went unanswered: Our Sponsors:* Check out Infinite Epigenetics: https://infiniteepigenetics.com/GOLD* Check out Justin Wine and use my code SCHIFF20 for a great deal: https://www.justinwine.comPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related