A note before we begin: This piece examines how linguistic authority operates in online platforms, with particular focus on Substack as a case study. It draws on sociolinguistic research into computer-mediated communication, stance, and algorithmic systems. The analysis focuses on specific patterns rather than offering comprehensive coverage of all digital linguistic phenomena.I also want to make clear (because words matter) that there is an important distinction and difference between authority - what I talk about in this series - and trust. Building trust online is a very different piece to what is here.Authority may command attention; trust has to be earned.When you publish on Substack, your authority doesn’t come from your voice, your office, or the institution listed on your business card. There’s no accent to mark your class background, no pitch to signal your gender, no physical presence to command attention. Yet somehow, certain writers dominate the conversation while others remain invisible, regardless of the quality of their ideas.Online, authority gets constructed through language choices, platform mechanics, and algorithmic systems that amplify some voices while silencing others. The performance of credibility has replaced the presumption of authority, and the rules of this performance favor particular linguistic styles while marginalising others.If accent marks the body in offline interaction, online language marks position, and on platforms like Substack, where writers compete for attention in an oversaturated information economy, understanding how linguistic authority operates has never been more critical.It’s also not so straight-forward, as we’ll see. There’s a lot of “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” moments that come with navigating authentic communication online where we try to be the same person IRL as we do online. Digital platforms haven't eliminated hierarchies of voice and authority, they've relocated them from embodied markers (like accent, institutional position) to linguistic performance and algorithmic reward systems.Until we confront how these systems privilege particular voices, we'll keep replicating offline hierarchies in digital spaces with new mechanisms and justifications.From Embodied to Discursive Authority (3.42)How Substack’s Design Shapes Authority (15.08)Stance, Voice, and the Performance of Credibility (20.46)Algorithms as Linguistic Gatekeepers (23.51)Who Gets Heard—and Who Doesn’t (26.43)Beyond Substack: Patterns Across Platforms (29.42)The Substack Specific: What Makes This Platform Different (32.01)What This Means for Writers (and Readers) (35.30)The Question of Confidence (38.07) This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thestrategiclinguist.substack.com/subscribe

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related